MetaCap

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund (FAX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.8x vs 13.9x for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund). abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (15.53% vs 7.45%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CHW versus FAX key metrics
MetricCHWFAX
Share price$8.05$12.75
Market cap—$526.35M
1-day change-0.98%-0.31%
P/E ratio (TTM)2.8213.86
EPS (TTM)$2.85$0.92
Dividend yield7.45%15.53%
Annual dividend$0.60$1.98
52-week high$9.18$16.37
52-week low$6.98$12.60
Distance from 52-week high-12.31%-22.11%
Average volume192.89K160.67K
Shares outstanding—41.28M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (13.9x vs 2.8x trailing P/E).
  • abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (15.53% vs 7.45%).

About abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund

FAX stock →

Abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc is a close ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by Aberdeen Standard Investments (Asia) Limited. It is co-managed by Aberdeen Standard Investments Australia Limited and Aberdeen Asset Managers Limited.

Finance · Investment Managers

CHW vs FAX FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHW or FAX?

CHW has the lower trailing P/E at 2.8, versus 13.9 for FAX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund has the higher yield at 15.53%, compared with 7.45% for Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund.

Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons