MetaCap

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs Reaves Utility Income Fund (UTG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Reaves Utility Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.6x vs 2.8x for Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund). Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (7.47% vs 6.61%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CHW versus UTG key metrics
MetricCHWUTG
Share price$8.03$36.00
Market cap—$3.29B
1-day change-1.23%-1.64%
P/E ratio (TTM)2.822.61
EPS (TTM)$2.85$13.80
Dividend yield7.47%6.61%
Annual dividend$0.60$2.38
52-week high$9.18$43.90
52-week low$6.98$33.53
Distance from 52-week high-12.53%-18.00%
Average volume192.89K311.23K
Shares outstanding—91.43M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

About Reaves Utility Income Fund

UTG stock →

Reaves Utility Income Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched and managed by W. H.

Finance · Investment Managers

CHW vs UTG FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHW or UTG?

UTG has the lower trailing P/E at 2.6, versus 2.8 for CHW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or Reaves Utility Income Fund?

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund has the higher yield at 7.47%, compared with 6.61% for Reaves Utility Income Fund.

Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and Reaves Utility Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons