MetaCap

Core Laboratories (CLB) vs OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE) has outperformed Core Laboratories (CLB) over the past year, gaining 9.1% versus a loss of 15.9%. Core Laboratories is the larger company by market cap ($466.2 million vs $183.4 million), about 2.5 times the size. On valuation, OMS Energy Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (5.5x vs 14.7x for Core Laboratories).

Core Laboratories pays a dividend yielding 0.39%, while OMS Energy Technologies does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CLB-15.89%OMSE+9.09%
+76%+26%-24%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CLB-14.26%OMSE-45.11%
+71%+3%-64%
May 12, 20255 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CLB versus OMSE key metrics
MetricCLBOMSE
Share price$10.16$4.32
Market cap$466.19M$183.38M
1-day change+0.49%-2.49%
YTD return-36.62%-1.82%
1-year return-15.89%+9.09%
5-year return-67.79%—
P/E ratio (TTM)19.545.61
Forward P/E14.725.47
EPS (TTM)$0.52$0.77
Dividend yield0.39%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.04$0.00
52-week high$20.36$7.10
52-week low$9.63$3.35
Distance from 52-week high-50.10%-39.15%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+47.64%+131.48%
Average volume623.47K24.68K
Shares outstanding45.88M42.45M
Employees3,300613
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOilfield Services/EquipmentOil & Gas Equipment & Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Core Laboratories is about 2.5 times larger than OMS Energy Technologies by market value ($466.19M vs $183.38M).
  • OMSE has outperformed CLB by 25.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Core Laboratories trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.5x vs 5.6x trailing P/E).

About Core Laboratories

CLB stock →

Core Laboratories Inc. provides reservoir description and production enhancement services and products to the oil and gas industry in the United States, and internationally.

Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 3,300 employees

About OMS Energy Technologies

OMSE stock →

OMS Energy Technologies Inc., through its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells specialty connectors and pipes, surface wellhead and Christmas trees, premium threading services, and other ancillary services in Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Cayman Island, and internationally. The company offers pipe connectors, joints, tubes, extensions, and related accessories for use in drilling; and threading and repair, inspection, and tubular running services for oil and gas industry.

Energy · Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · 613 employees

CLB vs OMSE FAQ

Which is bigger, Core Laboratories or OMS Energy Technologies?

Core Laboratories (CLB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $466.19M compared with $183.38M for OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLB or OMSE?

OMSE returned +9.09% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.89% for CLB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLB or OMSE?

OMSE has the lower trailing P/E at 5.6, versus 19.5 for CLB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Core Laboratories or OMS Energy Technologies?

Core Laboratories pays a dividend yielding 0.39%, while OMS Energy Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Core Laboratories and OMS Energy Technologies in the same industry?

Both are in the Energy sector, but in different industries: Oilfield Services/Equipment for Core Laboratories and Oil & Gas Equipment & Services for OMS Energy Technologies.

More comparisons