Core Laboratories (CLB) vs Ranger Energy Services (RNGR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Ranger Energy Services (RNGR) has outperformed Core Laboratories (CLB) over the past year, gaining 17.0% versus a loss of 15.9%. Over five years, RNGR leads with a +54.1% price change compared with -67.8% for CLB. Core Laboratories is the larger company by market cap ($466.2 million vs $361.8 million), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Ranger Energy Services trades at a lower forward P/E (10.6x vs 14.7x for Core Laboratories). Ranger Energy Services offers the higher dividend yield (1.55% vs 0.39%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLB | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $10.16 | $15.46 |
| Market cap | $466.19M | $361.80M |
| 1-day change | +0.49% | +0.52% |
| YTD return | -36.62% | +10.59% |
| 1-year return | -15.89% | +17.03% |
| 5-year return | -67.79% | +54.14% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.54 | 25.77 |
| Forward P/E | 14.72 | 10.59 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.52 | $0.60 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 1.55% |
| Annual dividend | $0.04 | $0.24 |
| 52-week high | $20.36 | $18.82 |
| 52-week low | $9.63 | $11.88 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -50.10% | -17.83% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +47.64% | +20.76% |
| Average volume | 623.47K | 196.96K |
| Shares outstanding | 45.88M | 23.40M |
| Employees | 3,300 | 2,300 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oilfield Services/Equipment | Oilfield Services/Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RNGR has outperformed CLB by 32.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Ranger Energy Services trades at a higher earnings multiple (25.8x vs 19.5x trailing P/E).
- Ranger Energy Services offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.55% vs 0.39%).
About Core Laboratories
CLB stock →Core Laboratories Inc. provides reservoir description and production enhancement services and products to the oil and gas industry in the United States, and internationally.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 3,300 employees
About Ranger Energy Services
RNGR stock →Ranger Energy Services, Inc. provides onshore high specification well service rigs, wireline services, and complementary services to exploration and production companies in the United States.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 2,300 employees
CLB vs RNGR FAQ
Which is bigger, Core Laboratories or Ranger Energy Services?
Core Laboratories (CLB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $466.19M compared with $361.80M for Ranger Energy Services (RNGR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLB or RNGR?
RNGR returned +17.03% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.89% for CLB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLB or RNGR?
CLB has the lower trailing P/E at 19.5, versus 25.8 for RNGR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Core Laboratories or Ranger Energy Services?
Ranger Energy Services has the higher yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.39% for Core Laboratories.
Are Core Laboratories and Ranger Energy Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry within the Energy sector.