Core Laboratories (CLB) vs North American Construction Group (NOA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Core Laboratories (CLB) has outperformed North American Construction Group (NOA) over the past year, losing 15.2% versus a loss of 18.6%. Over five years, NOA leads with a -26.3% price change compared with -67.9% for CLB. Core Laboratories is the larger company by market cap ($463.9 million vs $319.7 million), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, North American Construction Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.9x vs 14.7x for Core Laboratories). North American Construction Group offers the higher dividend yield (4.04% vs 0.40%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLB | NOA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $10.11 | $11.88 |
| Market cap | $463.89M | $319.74M |
| 1-day change | -1.84% | -2.94% |
| YTD return | -36.93% | -17.33% |
| 1-year return | -15.18% | -18.57% |
| 5-year return | -67.95% | -26.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.44 | 14.67 |
| Forward P/E | 14.65 | 6.86 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.52 | $0.81 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | 4.04% |
| Annual dividend | $0.04 | $0.48 |
| 52-week high | $20.36 | $17.26 |
| 52-week low | $9.63 | $11.73 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -50.34% | -31.17% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +48.37% | +121.13% |
| Average volume | 635.91K | 97.56K |
| Shares outstanding | 45.88M | 26.91M |
| Employees | 3,300 | 693 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oilfield Services/Equipment | Oilfield Services/Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Core Laboratories trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.4x vs 14.7x trailing P/E).
- North American Construction Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.04% vs 0.40%).
About Core Laboratories
CLB stock →Core Laboratories Inc. provides reservoir description and production enhancement services and products to the oil and gas industry in the United States, and internationally.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 3,300 employees
About North American Construction Group
NOA stock →North American Construction Group Ltd. provides mining and heavy civil construction services to customers in the resource development and industrial construction sectors in Australia, Canada, and the United States.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 693 employees
CLB vs NOA FAQ
Which is bigger, Core Laboratories or North American Construction Group?
Core Laboratories (CLB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $463.89M compared with $319.74M for North American Construction Group (NOA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLB or NOA?
CLB returned -15.18% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.57% for NOA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLB or NOA?
NOA has the lower trailing P/E at 14.7, versus 19.4 for CLB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Core Laboratories or North American Construction Group?
North American Construction Group has the higher yield at 4.04%, compared with 0.40% for Core Laboratories.
Are Core Laboratories and North American Construction Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry within the Energy sector.