North American Construction Group (NOA) vs Ranger Energy Services (RNGR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Ranger Energy Services (RNGR) has outperformed North American Construction Group (NOA) over the past year, gaining 21.0% versus a loss of 17.8%. Over five years, RNGR leads with a +53.7% price change compared with -26.3% for NOA. Ranger Energy Services is the larger company by market cap ($360.9 million vs $317.6 million), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, North American Construction Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.8x vs 10.6x for Ranger Energy Services). North American Construction Group offers the higher dividend yield (4.07% vs 1.56%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $11.80 | $15.42 |
| Market cap | $317.58M | $360.86M |
| 1-day change | -0.67% | -0.26% |
| YTD return | -17.88% | +10.30% |
| 1-year return | -17.83% | +21.04% |
| 5-year return | -26.35% | +53.74% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.75 | 25.70 |
| Forward P/E | 6.83 | 10.56 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.80 | $0.60 |
| Dividend yield | 4.07% | 1.56% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.24 |
| 52-week high | $17.26 | $18.82 |
| 52-week low | $11.72 | $11.88 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.63% | -18.04% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +122.63% | +21.08% |
| Average volume | 98.00K | 196.71K |
| Shares outstanding | 26.91M | 23.40M |
| Employees | 693 | 2,300 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oilfield Services/Equipment | Oilfield Services/Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RNGR has outperformed NOA by 38.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Ranger Energy Services trades at a higher earnings multiple (25.7x vs 14.8x trailing P/E).
- North American Construction Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.07% vs 1.56%).
About North American Construction Group
NOA stock →North American Construction Group Ltd. provides mining and heavy civil construction services to customers in the resource development and industrial construction sectors in Australia, Canada, and the United States.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 693 employees
About Ranger Energy Services
RNGR stock →Ranger Energy Services, Inc. provides onshore high specification well service rigs, wireline services, and complementary services to exploration and production companies in the United States.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 2,300 employees
NOA vs RNGR FAQ
Which is bigger, North American Construction Group or Ranger Energy Services?
Ranger Energy Services (RNGR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $360.86M compared with $317.58M for North American Construction Group (NOA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NOA or RNGR?
RNGR returned +21.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.83% for NOA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, NOA or RNGR?
NOA has the lower trailing P/E at 14.8, versus 25.7 for RNGR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, North American Construction Group or Ranger Energy Services?
North American Construction Group has the higher yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.56% for Ranger Energy Services.
Are North American Construction Group and Ranger Energy Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry within the Energy sector.