Clean Harbors (CLH) vs GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Clean Harbors (CLH) has outperformed GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL) over the past year, gaining 36.0% versus a loss of 7.8%. Over five years, CLH leads with a +192.4% price change compared with +8.2% for GFL. Clean Harbors is the larger company by market cap ($16.75 billion vs $15.28 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Clean Harbors trades at a lower forward P/E (31.8x vs 43.5x for GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value). GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value pays a dividend yielding 0.20%, while Clean Harbors does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLH | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $317.34 | $42.33 |
| Market cap | $16.75B | $15.28B |
| 1-day change | +0.57% | +0.69% |
| YTD return | +34.57% | -1.44% |
| 1-year return | +36.01% | -7.82% |
| 5-year return | +192.38% | +8.21% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 38.47 | — |
| Forward P/E | 31.75 | 43.50 |
| EPS (TTM) | $8.25 | $-0.46 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.084 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.03B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.39% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $390.97M | — |
| Gross margin | 31.28% | — |
| Operating margin | 11.17% | — |
| Net margin | 6.48% | — |
| 52-week high | $335.94 | $47.01 |
| 52-week low | $201.34 | $33.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.54% | -9.96% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.92% | +19.16% |
| Average volume | 437.29K | 2.64M |
| Shares outstanding | 52.79M | 349.08M |
| Employees | 22,155 | 15,500 |
| Sector | Industrials | Utilities |
| Industry | Environmental Services | Environmental Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CLH has outperformed GFL by 43.8 percentage points over the past year.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Clean Harbors in Industrials and GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value in Utilities.
About Clean Harbors
CLH stock →Clean Harbors, Inc. provides environmental and industrial services in the United States and Canada.
Industrials · Environmental Services · 22,155 employees
About GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value
GFL stock →GFL Environmental Inc. provides non-hazardous solid waste management services in Canada and the United States.
Utilities · Environmental Services · 15,500 employees
CLH vs GFL FAQ
Which is bigger, Clean Harbors or GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value?
Clean Harbors (CLH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $16.75B compared with $15.28B for GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLH or GFL?
CLH returned +36.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.82% for GFL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Clean Harbors or GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value?
GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value pays a dividend yielding 0.20%, while Clean Harbors does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Clean Harbors and GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Environmental Services industry within the Industrials sector.