Casella Waste Systems (CWST) vs GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL) has outperformed Casella Waste Systems (CWST) over the past year, losing 7.8% versus a loss of 8.3%. Over five years, GFL leads with a +8.2% price change compared with +5.1% for CWST. GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value is the larger company by market cap ($15.28 billion vs $5.35 billion), about 2.9 times the size.
On valuation, GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value trades at a lower forward P/E (43.6x vs 57.3x for Casella Waste Systems). GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value pays a dividend yielding 0.20%, while Casella Waste Systems does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $84.05 | $42.33 |
| Market cap | $5.35B | $15.28B |
| 1-day change | +0.39% | +0.69% |
| YTD return | -14.18% | -1.44% |
| 1-year return | -8.33% | -7.82% |
| 5-year return | +5.06% | +8.21% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 933.89 | — |
| Forward P/E | 57.26 | 43.64 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.09 | $-0.46 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.084 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.84B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +17.95% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $7.87M | — |
| Gross margin | 33.77% | — |
| Operating margin | 3.47% | — |
| Net margin | 0.43% | — |
| 52-week high | $107.96 | $47.01 |
| 52-week low | $74.05 | $33.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.15% | -9.96% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.06% | +19.16% |
| Average volume | 572.35K | 2.64M |
| Shares outstanding | 62.65M | 349.08M |
| Employees | 5,600 | 15,500 |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Environmental Services | Environmental Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value is about 2.9 times larger than Casella Waste Systems by market value ($15.28B vs $5.35B).
About Casella Waste Systems
CWST stock →Casella Waste Systems, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a vertically integrated solid waste services company in the United States. The company offers resource management expertise and services primarily in the areas of solid waste collection and disposal, transfer, recycling and organics services to residential, commercial, municipal, institutional, and industrial customers.
Utilities · Environmental Services · 5,600 employees
About GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value
GFL stock →GFL Environmental Inc. provides non-hazardous solid waste management services in Canada and the United States.
Utilities · Environmental Services · 15,500 employees
CWST vs GFL FAQ
Which is bigger, Casella Waste Systems or GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value?
GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $15.28B compared with $5.35B for Casella Waste Systems (CWST).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CWST or GFL?
GFL returned -7.82% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.33% for CWST (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Casella Waste Systems or GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value?
GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value pays a dividend yielding 0.20%, while Casella Waste Systems does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Casella Waste Systems and GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Environmental Services industry within the Utilities sector.