GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL) vs Waste Management (WM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Waste Management (WM) has outperformed GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL) over the past year, losing 4.0% versus a loss of 7.7%. Over five years, WM leads with a +32.1% price change compared with +7.5% for GFL. Waste Management is the larger company by market cap ($83.98 billion vs $15.28 billion), about 5.5 times the size.
On valuation, Waste Management trades at a lower forward P/E (23.1x vs 43.5x for GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value). Waste Management offers the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 0.20%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFL | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $42.33 | $210.10 |
| Market cap | $15.28B | $83.98B |
| 1-day change | +0.69% | +0.56% |
| YTD return | -2.12% | -4.90% |
| 1-year return | -7.67% | -3.96% |
| 5-year return | +7.46% | +32.10% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 29.76 |
| Forward P/E | 43.50 | 23.12 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.46 | $7.06 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 1.68% |
| Annual dividend | $0.084 | $3.54 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $25.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +14.24% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $2.71B |
| Gross margin | — | 40.44% |
| Operating margin | — | 17.09% |
| Net margin | — | 10.74% |
| 52-week high | $47.01 | $248.13 |
| 52-week low | $33.33 | $194.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -9.96% | -15.33% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +19.16% | +23.07% |
| Average volume | 2.64M | 2.05M |
| Shares outstanding | 349.08M | 399.72M |
| Employees | 15,500 | 60,500 |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Environmental Services | Environmental Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Waste Management is about 5.5 times larger than GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value by market value ($83.98B vs $15.28B).
- Waste Management offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 0.20%).
About GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value
GFL stock →GFL Environmental Inc. provides non-hazardous solid waste management services in Canada and the United States.
Utilities · Environmental Services · 15,500 employees
About Waste Management
WM stock →Waste Management, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides environmental solutions to residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal customers in the United States, Canada, Western Europe, and internationally. It offers collection services, including picking up and transporting waste and recyclable materials from where it was generated to a transfer station, recovery facility, or disposal site; owns and operates transfer stations; and owns, develops, and operates landfill gas-to-energy facilities that produce renewable electricity and renewable natural gas.
Utilities · Environmental Services · 60,500 employees
GFL vs WM FAQ
Which is bigger, GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value or Waste Management?
Waste Management (WM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $83.98B compared with $15.28B for GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value (GFL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFL or WM?
WM returned -3.96% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.67% for GFL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value or Waste Management?
Waste Management has the higher yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.20% for GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value.
Are GFL Environmental Subordinate voting shares no par value and Waste Management in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Environmental Services industry within the Utilities sector.