CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) vs Energy Transfer (ET)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Energy Transfer is the larger company by market cap ($70.28 billion vs $5.98 billion), about 11.8 times the size. On valuation, Energy Transfer trades at a lower forward P/E (11.7x vs 13.4x for CMB.TECH NV). Energy Transfer offers the higher dividend yield (6.59% vs 1.99%).
CMB.TECH NV converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 92.6% versus 5.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CMBT | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $20.60 | $20.41 |
| Market cap | $5.98B | $70.28B |
| 1-day change | -1.01% | -1.02% |
| YTD return | +115.65% | — |
| 1-year return | +130.97% | — |
| 5-year return | +91.44% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.96 | 13.98 |
| Forward P/E | 13.38 | 11.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.96 | $1.46 |
| Dividend yield | 1.99% | 6.59% |
| Annual dividend | $0.41 | $1.35 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $940.25M | $85.54B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -23.87% | +3.47% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $870.83M | $4.43B |
| Gross margin | — | 25.77% |
| Operating margin | 106.62% | 10.55% |
| Net margin | 92.62% | 5.18% |
| 52-week high | $20.89 | $21.84 |
| 52-week low | $8.95 | $16.18 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -1.36% | -6.55% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -0.73% | +21.22% |
| Average volume | 994.77K | 8.88M |
| Shares outstanding | 290.17M | 3.44B |
| Employees | — | 22,311 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Energy |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Oil & Gas Midstream |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Energy Transfer is about 11.8 times larger than CMB.TECH NV by market value ($70.28B vs $5.98B).
- Energy Transfer trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.0x vs 7.0x trailing P/E).
- Energy Transfer offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.59% vs 1.99%).
- CMB.TECH NV is more profitable, keeping 92.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.2 cents for Energy Transfer.
- Energy Transfer grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.47% vs -23.87%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: CMB.TECH NV in Consumer Discretionary and Energy Transfer in Energy.
About CMB.TECH NV
CMBT stock →Cmb.Tech NV engages in marine transportation business in Belgium. It operates through three divisions: Marine, H2 Infra, and H2 Industry.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation
About Energy Transfer
ET stock →Energy Transfer LP, together with its subsidiaries, provides energy-related services in the United States. It operates through Intrastate Transportation and Storage; Interstate Transportation and Storage; Midstream; Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) and Refined Products Transportation and Services; Crude Oil Transportation and Services; Investment in Sunoco LP; Investment in USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC); and All Other segments.
Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream · 22,311 employees
CMBT vs ET FAQ
Which is bigger, CMB.TECH NV or Energy Transfer?
Energy Transfer (ET) is larger, with a market capitalization of $70.28B compared with $5.98B for CMB.TECH NV (CMBT).
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CMBT or ET?
CMBT has the lower trailing P/E at 7.0, versus 14.0 for ET. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMB.TECH NV or Energy Transfer?
Energy Transfer has the higher yield at 6.59%, compared with 1.99% for CMB.TECH NV.
Are CMB.TECH NV and Energy Transfer in the same industry?
No. CMB.TECH NV is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Energy Transfer is in Energy.