CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) vs Golar Lng (GLNG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) has outperformed Golar Lng (GLNG) over the past year, gaining 120.6% versus a gain of 27.1%. Over five years, GLNG leads with a +262.6% price change compared with +84.9% for CMBT. CMB.TECH NV is the larger company by market cap ($5.79 billion vs $5.02 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Golar Lng is growing revenue faster (+51.1% vs -23.9%).
On valuation, CMB.TECH NV trades at a lower forward P/E (13.0x vs 78.3x for Golar Lng). CMB.TECH NV offers the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 2.04%). CMB.TECH NV converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 92.6% versus 16.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CMBT | GLNG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $19.95 | $49.14 |
| Market cap | $5.79B | $5.02B |
| 1-day change | +1.37% | -1.78% |
| YTD return | +108.29% | +31.93% |
| 1-year return | +120.64% | +27.14% |
| 5-year return | +84.91% | +262.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.74 | 33.66 |
| Forward P/E | 12.95 | 78.32 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.96 | $1.46 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 2.04% |
| Annual dividend | $0.41 | $1.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $940.25M | $393.52M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -23.87% | +51.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $870.83M | $65.68M |
| Operating margin | 106.62% | 25.34% |
| Net margin | 92.62% | 16.69% |
| 52-week high | $20.82 | $57.79 |
| 52-week low | $8.88 | $35.02 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -4.18% | -14.97% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +2.51% | +34.88% |
| Average volume | 991.69K | 1.30M |
| Shares outstanding | 290.17M | 102.10M |
| Employees | — | 500 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CMBT has outperformed GLNG by 93.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Golar Lng trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.7x vs 6.7x trailing P/E).
- CMB.TECH NV is more profitable, keeping 92.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 16.7 cents for Golar Lng.
- Golar Lng grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+51.14% vs -23.87%).
About CMB.TECH NV
CMBT stock →Cmb.Tech NV engages in marine transportation business in Belgium. It operates through three divisions: Marine, H2 Infra, and H2 Industry.
Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream
About Golar Lng
GLNG stock →Golar LNG Limited designs, converts, owns, and operates marine infrastructure for the liquefaction of natural gas. The company operates in two segments, FLNG, and Corporate and Other.
Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream · 500 employees
CMBT vs GLNG FAQ
Which is bigger, CMB.TECH NV or Golar Lng?
CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.79B compared with $5.02B for Golar Lng (GLNG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CMBT or GLNG?
CMBT returned +120.64% over the past 12 months, compared with +27.14% for GLNG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CMBT or GLNG?
CMBT has the lower trailing P/E at 6.7, versus 33.7 for GLNG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMB.TECH NV or Golar Lng?
CMB.TECH NV has the higher yield at 2.06%, compared with 2.04% for Golar Lng.
Are CMB.TECH NV and Golar Lng in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector.