CNA Financial (CNA) vs W.R. Berkley (WRB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
CNA Financial (CNA) has outperformed W.R. Berkley (WRB) over the past year, losing 2.2% versus a loss of 10.3%. Over five years, WRB leads with a +101.7% price change compared with +1.1% for CNA. W.R. Berkley is the larger company by market cap ($25.89 billion vs $12.41 billion), about 2.1 times the size.
On valuation, CNA Financial trades at a lower forward P/E (9.6x vs 14.3x for W.R. Berkley). CNA Financial offers the higher dividend yield (4.10% vs 0.53%). W.R. Berkley converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.1% versus 8.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CNA | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $45.86 | $69.73 |
| Market cap | $12.41B | $25.89B |
| 1-day change | -0.76% | +0.11% |
| YTD return | -3.94% | -0.56% |
| 1-year return | -2.22% | -10.34% |
| 5-year return | +1.12% | +101.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.10 | 14.32 |
| Forward P/E | 9.55 | 14.29 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.54 | $4.87 |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | 0.53% |
| Annual dividend | $1.88 | $0.37 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $14.99B | $14.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.04% | +7.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.28B | $1.78B |
| Net margin | 8.53% | 12.10% |
| 52-week high | $55.71 | $78.96 |
| 52-week low | $41.53 | $62.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -17.68% | -11.69% |
| Analyst consensus | none | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +6.85% | -0.96% |
| Average volume | 489.40K | 2.50M |
| Shares outstanding | 270.60M | 371.23M |
| Employees | 6,600 | 8,804 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- W.R. Berkley is about 2.1 times larger than CNA Financial by market value ($25.89B vs $12.41B).
- W.R. Berkley trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.3x vs 10.1x trailing P/E).
- CNA Financial offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.10% vs 0.53%).
About CNA Financial
CNA stock →CNA Financial Corporation, an insurance holding company, primarily provides commercial property and casualty insurance products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, and internationally. It operates through Specialty, Commercial, International, and Life & Group segments.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 6,600 employees
About W.R. Berkley
WRB stock →W. R.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 8,804 employees
CNA vs WRB FAQ
Which is bigger, CNA Financial or W.R. Berkley?
W.R. Berkley (WRB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $25.89B compared with $12.41B for CNA Financial (CNA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNA or WRB?
CNA returned -2.22% over the past 12 months, compared with -10.34% for WRB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CNA or WRB?
CNA has the lower trailing P/E at 10.1, versus 14.3 for WRB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNA Financial or W.R. Berkley?
CNA Financial has the higher yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.53% for W.R. Berkley.
Are CNA Financial and W.R. Berkley in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.