Core Natural Resources (CNR) vs Ramaco Resources (METC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Core Natural Resources (CNR) has outperformed Ramaco Resources (METC) over the past year, losing 9.4% versus a loss of 79.5%. Over five years, CNR leads with a +171.1% price change compared with -42.8% for METC. Core Natural Resources is the larger company by market cap ($4.40 billion vs $540.7 million), about 8.1 times the size.
On valuation, Core Natural Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (13.3x vs 28.9x for Ramaco Resources). Core Natural Resources pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while Ramaco Resources does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CNR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $88.55 | $8.49 |
| Market cap | $4.40B | $540.67M |
| 1-day change | -0.36% | +3.16% |
| YTD return | +0.05% | -52.83% |
| 1-year return | -9.37% | -79.54% |
| 5-year return | +171.13% | -42.76% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 44.72 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.33 | 28.94 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.98 | $-1.03 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.40 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.16B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +86.23% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-153.22M | — |
| Gross margin | 14.89% | — |
| Operating margin | -4.37% | — |
| Net margin | -3.68% | — |
| 52-week high | $114.80 | $57.80 |
| 52-week low | $74.75 | $7.77 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.87% | -85.31% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.66% | +118.02% |
| Average volume | 517.59K | 2.09M |
| Shares outstanding | 49.64M | 51.88M |
| Employees | 4,850 | 900 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Coal Mining | Coal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Core Natural Resources is about 8.1 times larger than Ramaco Resources by market value ($4.40B vs $540.67M).
- CNR has outperformed METC by 70.2 percentage points over the past year.
About Core Natural Resources
CNR stock →Core Natural Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces, sells, and exports metallurgical and thermal coals in the United States and internationally. It operates through the High CV Thermal; Metallurgical; Powder River Basin (PRB); and Core Marine Terminal segments.
Energy · Coal Mining · 4,850 employees
About Ramaco Resources
METC stock →Ramaco Resources, Inc. engages in the development, operation, and sale of metallurgical coal.
Energy · Coal Mining · 900 employees
CNR vs METC FAQ
Which is bigger, Core Natural Resources or Ramaco Resources?
Core Natural Resources (CNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.40B compared with $540.67M for Ramaco Resources (METC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNR or METC?
CNR returned -9.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -79.54% for METC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Core Natural Resources or Ramaco Resources?
Core Natural Resources pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while Ramaco Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Core Natural Resources and Ramaco Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Coal Mining industry within the Energy sector.