Peabody Energy (BTU) vs Core Natural Resources (CNR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Core Natural Resources (CNR) has outperformed Peabody Energy (BTU) over the past year, losing 9.4% versus a loss of 21.2%. Over five years, CNR leads with a +171.1% price change compared with +56.6% for BTU. Core Natural Resources is the larger company by market cap ($4.44 billion vs $3.13 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Peabody Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 13.5x for Core Natural Resources). Peabody Energy offers the higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.45%). Peabody Energy converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of -1.1% versus -3.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BTU | CNR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $25.71 | $89.40 |
| Market cap | $3.13B | $4.44B |
| 1-day change | +2.82% | +0.95% |
| YTD return | -15.82% | +0.05% |
| 1-year return | -21.24% | -9.37% |
| 5-year return | +56.64% | +171.13% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 45.15 |
| Forward P/E | 9.01 | 13.45 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.49 | $1.98 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 0.45% |
| Annual dividend | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.86B | $4.16B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -8.86% | +86.23% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-42.50M | $-153.22M |
| Gross margin | — | 14.89% |
| Operating margin | -2.07% | -4.37% |
| Net margin | -1.10% | -3.68% |
| 52-week high | $41.14 | $114.80 |
| 52-week low | $20.06 | $74.75 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.52% | -22.13% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.86% | +22.49% |
| Average volume | 2.34M | 520.65K |
| Shares outstanding | 121.90M | 49.64M |
| Employees | 5,400 | 4,850 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Coal Mining | Coal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CNR has outperformed BTU by 11.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Core Natural Resources grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+86.23% vs -8.86%).
About Peabody Energy
BTU stock →Peabody Energy Corporation engages in the production of metallurgical and thermal coal. It operates through Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin, and Other U.S.
Energy · Coal Mining · 5,400 employees
About Core Natural Resources
CNR stock →Core Natural Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces, sells, and exports metallurgical and thermal coals in the United States and internationally. It operates through the High CV Thermal; Metallurgical; Powder River Basin (PRB); and Core Marine Terminal segments.
Energy · Coal Mining · 4,850 employees
BTU vs CNR FAQ
Which is bigger, Peabody Energy or Core Natural Resources?
Core Natural Resources (CNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.44B compared with $3.13B for Peabody Energy (BTU).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BTU or CNR?
CNR returned -9.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.24% for BTU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Peabody Energy or Core Natural Resources?
Peabody Energy has the higher yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.45% for Core Natural Resources.
Are Peabody Energy and Core Natural Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Coal Mining industry within the Energy sector.