MetaCap

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) vs Core Natural Resources (CNR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) has outperformed Core Natural Resources (CNR) over the past year, gaining 2.7% versus a loss of 9.5%. Over five years, AMR leads with a +181.8% price change compared with +171.1% for CNR. Core Natural Resources is the larger company by market cap ($4.39 billion vs $2.30 billion), about 1.9 times the size.

On valuation, Alpha Metallurgical Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (9.9x vs 13.3x for Core Natural Resources). Core Natural Resources pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources does not currently pay one. Alpha Metallurgical Resources converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of -2.9% versus -3.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AMR+4.09%CNR-9.41%
+53%+13%-26%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
AMR+187.54%CNR+160.82%
+596%+263%-70%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AMR versus CNR key metrics
MetricAMRCNR
Share price$181.57$88.46
Market cap$2.30B$4.39B
1-day change+4.18%-0.10%
YTD return-12.81%-0.06%
1-year return+2.67%-9.50%
5-year return+181.78%+171.13%
P/E ratio (TTM)—44.68
Forward P/E9.9413.31
EPS (TTM)$-3.59$1.98
Dividend yield0.00%0.45%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.40
Revenue (latest FY)$2.13B$4.16B
Revenue growth (YoY)-27.99%+86.23%
Net income (latest FY)$-61.69M$-153.22M
Gross margin9.62%14.89%
Operating margin-2.88%-4.37%
Net margin-2.90%-3.68%
52-week high$253.82$114.80
52-week low$133.64$74.75
Distance from 52-week high-28.47%-22.94%
Analyst consensusholdnone
Avg. price target upside+2.81%+23.78%
Average volume318.01K520.65K
Shares outstanding12.68M49.64M
Employees3,9504,850
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryCoal MiningCoal Mining

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • AMR has outperformed CNR by 12.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Core Natural Resources grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+86.23% vs -27.99%).

About Alpha Metallurgical Resources

AMR stock →

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc., a mining company, produces, processes, and sells met and thermal coal in Virginia and West Virginia. The company provides metallurgical coal products.

Energy · Coal Mining · 3,950 employees

About Core Natural Resources

CNR stock →

Core Natural Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces, sells, and exports metallurgical and thermal coals in the United States and internationally. It operates through the High CV Thermal; Metallurgical; Powder River Basin (PRB); and Core Marine Terminal segments.

Energy · Coal Mining · 4,850 employees

AMR vs CNR FAQ

Which is bigger, Alpha Metallurgical Resources or Core Natural Resources?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.39B compared with $2.30B for Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AMR or CNR?

AMR returned +2.67% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.50% for CNR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Alpha Metallurgical Resources or Core Natural Resources?

Core Natural Resources pays a dividend yielding 0.45%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Alpha Metallurgical Resources and Core Natural Resources in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Coal Mining industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons