MetaCap

CNX Resources (CNX) vs Crescent Energy (CRGY)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Crescent Energy (CRGY) has outperformed CNX Resources (CNX) over the past year, gaining 42.0% versus a gain of 0.0%. CNX Resources is the larger company by market cap ($5.03 billion vs $4.98 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, Crescent Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (5.4x vs 8.9x for CNX Resources).

Crescent Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.79%, while CNX Resources does not currently pay one. CNX Resources converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.3% versus 3.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CNX+0.03%CRGY+42.03%
+72%+26%-20%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CNX+132.19%CRGY-18.69%
+201%+69%-64%
Dec 6, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CNX versus CRGY key metrics
MetricCNXCRGY
Share price$34.03$12.66
Market cap$5.03B$4.98B
1-day change+0.59%-2.69%
YTD return-8.00%+55.07%
1-year return+0.03%+42.03%
5-year return+155.32%—
P/E ratio (TTM)5.51115.09
Forward P/E8.905.44
EPS (TTM)$6.18$0.11
Dividend yield0.00%3.79%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.48
Revenue (latest FY)$2.24B$3.58B
Revenue growth (YoY)+76.76%+22.14%
Net income (latest FY)$633.16M$132.91M
Operating margin—6.40%
Net margin28.28%3.71%
52-week high$43.62$15.47
52-week low$30.78$7.68
Distance from 52-week high-21.99%-18.16%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+10.34%+37.99%
Average volume1.73M5.96M
Shares outstanding147.94M330.40M
Employees3901,066
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas ProductionOil & Gas Production

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CRGY has outperformed CNX by 42.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Crescent Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (115.1x vs 5.5x trailing P/E).
  • Crescent Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 0.00%).
  • CNX Resources is more profitable, keeping 28.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.7 cents for Crescent Energy.
  • CNX Resources grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+76.76% vs +22.14%).

About CNX Resources

CNX stock →

CNX Resources Corporation, an independent natural gas and midstream company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates in two segments, Shale and Coalbed Methane (CBM).

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 390 employees

About Crescent Energy

CRGY stock →

Crescent Energy Company engages in the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company's activities focused in Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta Basins.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,066 employees

CNX vs CRGY FAQ

Which is bigger, CNX Resources or Crescent Energy?

CNX Resources (CNX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.03B compared with $4.98B for Crescent Energy (CRGY).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNX or CRGY?

CRGY returned +42.03% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.03% for CNX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CNX or CRGY?

CNX has the lower trailing P/E at 5.5, versus 115.1 for CRGY. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CNX Resources or Crescent Energy?

Crescent Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.79%, while CNX Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are CNX Resources and Crescent Energy in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons