CNX Resources (CNX) vs Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) has outperformed CNX Resources (CNX) over the past year, gaining 94.6% versus a gain of 0.0%. Over five years, CNX leads with a +155.3% price change compared with +26.4% for PTEN. CNX Resources is the larger company by market cap ($5.00 billion vs $4.38 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, CNX Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (8.8x vs 32.7x for Patterson-UTI Energy). Patterson-UTI Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.14%, while CNX Resources does not currently pay one. CNX Resources converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.3% versus -1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CNX | PTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $33.83 | $11.48 |
| Market cap | $5.00B | $4.38B |
| 1-day change | -0.18% | +2.23% |
| YTD return | -8.00% | +87.89% |
| 1-year return | +0.03% | +94.58% |
| 5-year return | +155.32% | +26.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.47 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.85 | 32.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.18 | $-0.24 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.24B | $4.83B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +76.76% | -10.25% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $633.16M | $-93.64M |
| Operating margin | — | -0.85% |
| Net margin | 28.28% | -1.94% |
| 52-week high | $43.62 | $13.39 |
| 52-week low | $30.78 | $5.24 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.44% | -14.26% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +11.00% | +21.34% |
| Average volume | 1.73M | 8.16M |
| Shares outstanding | 147.94M | 381.38M |
| Employees | 390 | 7,900 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PTEN has outperformed CNX by 94.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Patterson-UTI Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.00%).
- CNX Resources is more profitable, keeping 28.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.9 cents for Patterson-UTI Energy.
- CNX Resources grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+76.76% vs -10.25%).
About CNX Resources
CNX stock →CNX Resources Corporation, an independent natural gas and midstream company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates in two segments, Shale and Coalbed Methane (CBM).
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 390 employees
About Patterson-UTI Energy
PTEN stock →Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides drilling and completion services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in the United States, Canada, Colombia, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Drilling Services, Completion Services, and Drilling Products.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 7,900 employees
CNX vs PTEN FAQ
Which is bigger, CNX Resources or Patterson-UTI Energy?
CNX Resources (CNX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.00B compared with $4.38B for Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNX or PTEN?
PTEN returned +94.58% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.03% for CNX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNX Resources or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Patterson-UTI Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.14%, while CNX Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are CNX Resources and Patterson-UTI Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.