Crescent Energy (CRGY) vs Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) has outperformed Crescent Energy (CRGY) over the past year, gaining 98.1% versus a gain of 41.3%. Crescent Energy is the larger company by market cap ($4.98 billion vs $4.31 billion), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, Crescent Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (5.4x vs 32.2x for Patterson-UTI Energy).
Crescent Energy offers the higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 3.18%). Crescent Energy converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.7% versus -1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CRGY | PTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.66 | $11.31 |
| Market cap | $4.98B | $4.31B |
| 1-day change | -2.69% | -1.48% |
| YTD return | +50.89% | +85.11% |
| 1-year return | +41.29% | +98.07% |
| 5-year return | — | +24.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 115.09 | — |
| Forward P/E | 5.44 | 32.22 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.11 | $-0.24 |
| Dividend yield | 3.79% | 3.18% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.58B | $4.83B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +22.14% | -10.25% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $132.91M | $-93.64M |
| Operating margin | 6.40% | -0.85% |
| Net margin | 3.71% | -1.94% |
| 52-week high | $15.47 | $13.39 |
| 52-week low | $7.68 | $5.24 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.16% | -15.53% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +37.99% | +23.17% |
| Average volume | 6.00M | 8.14M |
| Shares outstanding | 330.40M | 381.38M |
| Employees | 1,066 | 7,900 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Drilling |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PTEN has outperformed CRGY by 56.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Crescent Energy is more profitable, keeping 3.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.9 cents for Patterson-UTI Energy.
- Crescent Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+22.14% vs -10.25%).
About Crescent Energy
CRGY stock →Crescent Energy Company engages in the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company's activities focused in Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta Basins.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,066 employees
About Patterson-UTI Energy
PTEN stock →Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides drilling and completion services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in the United States, Canada, Colombia, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Drilling Services, Completion Services, and Drilling Products.
Energy · Oil & Gas Drilling · 7,900 employees
CRGY vs PTEN FAQ
Which is bigger, Crescent Energy or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Crescent Energy (CRGY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.98B compared with $4.31B for Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRGY or PTEN?
PTEN returned +98.07% over the past 12 months, compared with +41.29% for CRGY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Crescent Energy or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Crescent Energy has the higher yield at 3.79%, compared with 3.18% for Patterson-UTI Energy.
Are Crescent Energy and Patterson-UTI Energy in the same industry?
Both are in the Energy sector, but in different industries: Oil & Gas Production for Crescent Energy and Oil & Gas Drilling for Patterson-UTI Energy.