MetaCap

Canterbury Park 'New' (CPHC) vs Las Vegas Sands (LVS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Canterbury Park 'New' (CPHC) has outperformed Las Vegas Sands (LVS) over the past year, losing 6.7% versus a loss of 32.2%. Over five years, CPHC leads with a -1.4% price change compared with -10.0% for LVS. Las Vegas Sands is the larger company by market cap ($23.38 billion vs $81.7 million), about 286.2 times the size.

On valuation, Las Vegas Sands trades at a lower trailing P/E (14.0x vs 525.4x for Canterbury Park 'New'). Las Vegas Sands offers the higher dividend yield (3.19% vs 1.78%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CPHC-6.74%LVS-32.23%
+34%-1%-36%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CPHC-2.23%LVS-5.55%
+99%+38%-23%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CPHC versus LVS key metrics
MetricCPHCLVS
Share price$15.76$36.10
Market cap$81.70M$23.38B
1-day change+0.55%+0.81%
YTD return+2.35%-44.54%
1-year return-6.74%-32.23%
5-year return-1.43%-9.98%
P/E ratio (TTM)525.3714.05
Forward P/E—10.30
EPS (TTM)$0.03$2.57
Dividend yield1.78%3.19%
Annual dividend$0.28$1.15
Revenue (latest FY)—$13.02B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+15.22%
Net income (latest FY)—$1.63B
Operating margin—21.65%
Net margin—12.50%
52-week high$16.97$70.45
52-week low$14.39$35.28
Distance from 52-week high-7.12%-48.76%
Analyst consensus—buy
Avg. price target upside—+62.74%
Average volume1.65K5.41M
Shares outstanding5.18M647.70M
Employees21441,000
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryResorts & CasinosResorts & Casinos

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Las Vegas Sands is about 286.2 times larger than Canterbury Park 'New' by market value ($23.38B vs $81.70M).
  • CPHC has outperformed LVS by 25.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Canterbury Park 'New' trades at a higher earnings multiple (525.4x vs 14.0x trailing P/E).
  • Las Vegas Sands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.19% vs 1.78%).

About Canterbury Park 'New'

CPHC stock →

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in horse racing, casino, food and beverage, and real estate development businesses. The company operates year-round simulcasting of horse races, as well as wagering on live thoroughbred and quarter horse races on a seasonal basis.

Consumer Cyclical · Resorts & Casinos · 214 employees

About Las Vegas Sands

LVS stock →

Las Vegas Sands Corp., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, and operates integrated resorts in Macao and Singapore. It owns and operates The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel, The Londoner Macao, The Parisian Macao, The Plaza Macao and Four Seasons Hotel Macao, and The Sands Macao in Macao, the People's Republic of China; and Marina Bay Sands in Singapore.

Consumer Cyclical · Resorts & Casinos · 41,000 employees

CPHC vs LVS FAQ

Which is bigger, Canterbury Park 'New' or Las Vegas Sands?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $23.38B compared with $81.70M for Canterbury Park 'New' (CPHC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPHC or LVS?

CPHC returned -6.74% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.23% for LVS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CPHC or LVS?

LVS has the lower trailing P/E at 14.0, versus 525.4 for CPHC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Canterbury Park 'New' or Las Vegas Sands?

Las Vegas Sands has the higher yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.78% for Canterbury Park 'New'.

Are Canterbury Park 'New' and Las Vegas Sands in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Resorts & Casinos industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.

More comparisons