Canterbury Park 'New' (CPHC) vs Vail Resorts (MTN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Vail Resorts (MTN) has outperformed Canterbury Park 'New' (CPHC) over the past year, losing 5.5% versus a loss of 6.7%. Over five years, CPHC leads with a -1.4% price change compared with -56.6% for MTN. Vail Resorts is the larger company by market cap ($5.21 billion vs $81.7 million), about 63.7 times the size.
On valuation, Vail Resorts trades at a lower trailing P/E (35.5x vs 525.4x for Canterbury Park 'New'). Vail Resorts offers the higher dividend yield (6.08% vs 1.78%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CPHC | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.76 | $146.09 |
| Market cap | $81.70M | $5.21B |
| 1-day change | +0.55% | +2.56% |
| YTD return | +2.35% | +10.01% |
| 1-year return | -6.74% | -5.54% |
| 5-year return | -1.43% | -56.58% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 525.37 | 35.46 |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.05 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.03 | $4.12 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 6.08% |
| Annual dividend | $0.28 | $8.88 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $2.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -4.26% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $147.53M |
| Operating margin | — | 14.82% |
| Net margin | — | 5.20% |
| 52-week high | $16.97 | $163.34 |
| 52-week low | $14.39 | $118.51 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -7.12% | -10.56% |
| Analyst consensus | — | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | — | -1.53% |
| Average volume | 1.65K | 767.98K |
| Shares outstanding | 5.18M | 35.64M |
| Employees | 214 | 6,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Resorts & Casinos | Resorts & Casinos |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Vail Resorts is about 63.7 times larger than Canterbury Park 'New' by market value ($5.21B vs $81.70M).
- Canterbury Park 'New' trades at a higher earnings multiple (525.4x vs 35.5x trailing P/E).
- Vail Resorts offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.08% vs 1.78%).
About Canterbury Park 'New'
CPHC stock →Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in horse racing, casino, food and beverage, and real estate development businesses. The company operates year-round simulcasting of horse races, as well as wagering on live thoroughbred and quarter horse races on a seasonal basis.
Consumer Cyclical · Resorts & Casinos · 214 employees
About Vail Resorts
MTN stock →Vail Resorts, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates mountain resorts and regional ski areas in the United States and internationally. It operates in three segments: Mountain, Lodging, and Real Estate.
Consumer Cyclical · Resorts & Casinos · 6,500 employees
CPHC vs MTN FAQ
Which is bigger, Canterbury Park 'New' or Vail Resorts?
Vail Resorts (MTN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.21B compared with $81.70M for Canterbury Park 'New' (CPHC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPHC or MTN?
MTN returned -5.54% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.74% for CPHC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CPHC or MTN?
MTN has the lower trailing P/E at 35.5, versus 525.4 for CPHC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Canterbury Park 'New' or Vail Resorts?
Vail Resorts has the higher yield at 6.08%, compared with 1.78% for Canterbury Park 'New'.
Are Canterbury Park 'New' and Vail Resorts in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Resorts & Casinos industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.