Full House Resorts (FLL) vs Vail Resorts (MTN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Vail Resorts (MTN) has outperformed Full House Resorts (FLL) over the past year, losing 5.5% versus a loss of 55.8%. Over five years, MTN leads with a -56.6% price change compared with -89.5% for FLL. Vail Resorts is the larger company by market cap ($5.21 billion vs $44.7 million), about 116.4 times the size.
Vail Resorts pays a dividend yielding 6.08%, while Full House Resorts does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLL | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $1.22 | $146.09 |
| Market cap | $44.71M | $5.21B |
| 1-day change | -3.17% | +2.56% |
| YTD return | -53.26% | +10.01% |
| 1-year return | -55.80% | -5.54% |
| 5-year return | -89.50% | -56.58% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 35.46 |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.05 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.02 | $4.12 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.08% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $8.88 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $2.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -4.26% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $147.53M |
| Operating margin | — | 14.82% |
| Net margin | — | 5.20% |
| 52-week high | $3.37 | $163.34 |
| 52-week low | $1.15 | $118.51 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -63.80% | -10.56% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +145.90% | -1.53% |
| Average volume | 146.23K | 767.98K |
| Shares outstanding | 36.64M | 35.64M |
| Employees | 1,573 | 6,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Resorts & Casinos | Resorts & Casinos |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Vail Resorts is about 116.4 times larger than Full House Resorts by market value ($5.21B vs $44.71M).
- MTN has outperformed FLL by 50.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Vail Resorts offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.08% vs 0.00%).
About Full House Resorts
FLL stock →Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, leases, develops, manages, operates, and/or invests in casinos, and related hospitality and entertainment facilities in the United States.
Consumer Cyclical · Resorts & Casinos · 1,573 employees
About Vail Resorts
MTN stock →Vail Resorts, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates mountain resorts and regional ski areas in the United States and internationally. It operates in three segments: Mountain, Lodging, and Real Estate.
Consumer Cyclical · Resorts & Casinos · 6,500 employees
FLL vs MTN FAQ
Which is bigger, Full House Resorts or Vail Resorts?
Vail Resorts (MTN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.21B compared with $44.71M for Full House Resorts (FLL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLL or MTN?
MTN returned -5.54% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.80% for FLL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Full House Resorts or Vail Resorts?
Vail Resorts pays a dividend yielding 6.08%, while Full House Resorts does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Full House Resorts and Vail Resorts in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Resorts & Casinos industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.