Crescent Energy (CRGY) vs Par Pacific (PARR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Par Pacific (PARR) has outperformed Crescent Energy (CRGY) over the past year, gaining 126.3% versus a gain of 41.3%. Crescent Energy is the larger company by market cap ($4.98 billion vs $4.10 billion), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, Par Pacific trades at a lower forward P/E (5.4x vs 5.4x for Crescent Energy).
Crescent Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.79%, while Par Pacific does not currently pay one. Par Pacific converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.9% versus 3.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CRGY | PARR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.66 | $81.89 |
| Market cap | $4.98B | $4.10B |
| 1-day change | -2.69% | -6.57% |
| YTD return | +50.89% | +133.04% |
| 1-year return | +41.29% | +126.34% |
| 5-year return | — | +406.75% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 115.09 | 4.78 |
| Forward P/E | 5.44 | 5.44 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.11 | $17.13 |
| Dividend yield | 3.79% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.58B | $7.46B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +22.14% | -6.39% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $132.91M | $369.39M |
| Gross margin | — | 18.15% |
| Operating margin | 6.40% | 7.22% |
| Net margin | 3.71% | 4.95% |
| 52-week high | $15.47 | $89.45 |
| 52-week low | $7.68 | $33.43 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.16% | -8.45% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +37.99% | +4.85% |
| Average volume | 6.56M | 977.92K |
| Shares outstanding | 330.40M | 50.10M |
| Employees | 1,066 | 1,758 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PARR has outperformed CRGY by 85.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Crescent Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (115.1x vs 4.8x trailing P/E).
- Crescent Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 0.00%).
- Crescent Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+22.14% vs -6.39%).
About Crescent Energy
CRGY stock →Crescent Energy Company engages in the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company's activities focused in Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta Basins.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,066 employees
About Par Pacific
PARR stock →Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., an energy company, provides renewable and conventional fuels in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Refining, Retail, and Logistics.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,758 employees
CRGY vs PARR FAQ
Which is bigger, Crescent Energy or Par Pacific?
Crescent Energy (CRGY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.98B compared with $4.10B for Par Pacific (PARR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRGY or PARR?
PARR returned +126.34% over the past 12 months, compared with +41.29% for CRGY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CRGY or PARR?
PARR has the lower trailing P/E at 4.8, versus 115.1 for CRGY. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Crescent Energy or Par Pacific?
Crescent Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.79%, while Par Pacific does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Crescent Energy and Par Pacific in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.