Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) vs Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) has outperformed Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) over the past year, gaining 6.2% versus a loss of 33.9%. Blue Owl Technology Finance is the larger company by market cap ($4.24 billion vs $3.29 billion), about 1.3 times the size. On valuation, Calamos Strategic Total Return trades at a lower trailing P/E (3.1x vs 11.7x for Blue Owl Technology Finance).
Blue Owl Technology Finance offers the higher dividend yield (15.14% vs 3.00%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CSQ | OTF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $20.51 | $9.25 |
| Market cap | $3.29B | $4.24B |
| 1-day change | -0.44% | -1.18% |
| YTD return | +6.82% | -36.38% |
| 1-year return | +6.21% | -33.93% |
| 5-year return | +12.26% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 3.14 | 11.71 |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.75 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.53 | $0.79 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 15.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.615 | $1.40 |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $720.37M |
| 52-week high | $21.17 | $15.00 |
| 52-week low | $16.41 | $9.14 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -3.12% | -38.33% |
| Analyst consensus | — | none |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +47.14% |
| Average volume | 185.82K | 2.44M |
| Shares outstanding | 160.37M | 458.19M |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CSQ has outperformed OTF by 40.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Blue Owl Technology Finance trades at a higher earnings multiple (11.7x vs 3.1x trailing P/E).
- Blue Owl Technology Finance offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (15.14% vs 3.00%).
About Calamos Strategic Total Return
CSQ stock →Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched by Calamos Investments LLC. The fund is managed by Calamos Advisors LLC.
Financial Services · Asset Management
About Blue Owl Technology Finance
OTF stock →Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. is a business development company specializes in upper middle-market, making debt and equity investments such as senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans and equity-related securities including common equity, warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, finance and business development company.
Financial Services · Asset Management
CSQ vs OTF FAQ
Which is bigger, Calamos Strategic Total Return or Blue Owl Technology Finance?
Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.24B compared with $3.29B for Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CSQ or OTF?
CSQ returned +6.21% over the past 12 months, compared with -33.93% for OTF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CSQ or OTF?
CSQ has the lower trailing P/E at 3.1, versus 11.7 for OTF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Strategic Total Return or Blue Owl Technology Finance?
Blue Owl Technology Finance has the higher yield at 15.14%, compared with 3.00% for Calamos Strategic Total Return.
Are Calamos Strategic Total Return and Blue Owl Technology Finance in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector.