Capital Southwest (CSWC) vs Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund (FRA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Capital Southwest (CSWC) has outperformed Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund (FRA) over the past year, gaining 18.2% versus a loss of 20.4%. Over five years, CSWC leads with a -14.2% price change compared with -24.1% for FRA. On valuation, Capital Southwest trades at a lower trailing P/E (13.0x vs 26.4x for Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund).
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund offers the higher dividend yield (14.44% vs 9.86%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CSWC | FRA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $23.54 | $10.29 |
| Market cap | $1.50B | — |
| 1-day change | -0.84% | +0.39% |
| YTD return | +6.28% | -12.65% |
| 1-year return | +18.23% | -20.42% |
| 5-year return | -14.18% | -24.06% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.01 | 26.38 |
| Forward P/E | 10.09 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.81 | $0.39 |
| Dividend yield | 9.86% | 14.44% |
| Annual dividend | $2.32 | $1.49 |
| Net income (latest FY) | $113.00M | — |
| 52-week high | $25.75 | $12.95 |
| 52-week low | $19.37 | $10.21 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.58% | -20.54% |
| Analyst consensus | none | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.48% | — |
| Average volume | 624.94K | 155.69K |
| Shares outstanding | 63.73M | — |
| Employees | 36 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Finance |
| Industry | Textiles | Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CSWC has outperformed FRA by 38.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.4x vs 13.0x trailing P/E).
- Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (14.44% vs 9.86%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Capital Southwest in Consumer Discretionary and Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund in Finance.
About Capital Southwest
CSWC stock →Capital Southwest Corporation is a business development company. The firm specializes in credit and private equity and venture capital investments in lower middle market companies, mezzanine, later stage, mature, late venture, emerging growth, buyouts, industry consolidation, recapitalizations and growth capital investments.
Consumer Discretionary · Textiles · 36 employees
About Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund
FRA stock →BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund, Inc. is a close ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc.
Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service
CSWC vs FRA FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CSWC or FRA?
CSWC returned +18.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -20.42% for FRA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CSWC or FRA?
CSWC has the lower trailing P/E at 13.0, versus 26.4 for FRA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Capital Southwest or Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund?
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund has the higher yield at 14.44%, compared with 9.86% for Capital Southwest.
Are Capital Southwest and Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund in the same industry?
No. Capital Southwest is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund is in Finance.