Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs EQT (EQT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Cenovus Energy (CVE) has outperformed EQT (EQT) over the past year, gaining 78.0% versus a loss of 6.2%. Over five years, CVE leads with a +170.1% price change compared with +167.2% for EQT. Cenovus Energy is the larger company by market cap ($58.00 billion vs $33.13 billion), about 1.8 times the size.
On valuation, Cenovus Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (11.7x vs 14.0x for EQT). Cenovus Energy offers the higher dividend yield (2.61% vs 1.23%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $31.45 | $52.96 |
| Market cap | $58.00B | $33.13B |
| 1-day change | -0.13% | +0.04% |
| YTD return | +86.11% | -1.23% |
| 1-year return | +78.01% | -6.15% |
| 5-year return | +170.07% | +167.24% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.10 | 12.29 |
| Forward P/E | 11.65 | 14.04 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.60 | $4.31 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 1.23% |
| Annual dividend | $0.82 | $0.653 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $8.64B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +63.92% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $2.04B |
| Gross margin | — | 82.28% |
| Operating margin | — | 37.59% |
| Net margin | — | 23.59% |
| 52-week high | $34.16 | $68.24 |
| 52-week low | $15.63 | $47.94 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -7.93% | -22.39% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +17.68% | +26.87% |
| Average volume | 7.10M | 7.20M |
| Shares outstanding | 1.84B | 625.52M |
| Employees | 7,211 | 1,523 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CVE has outperformed EQT by 84.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Cenovus Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.61% vs 1.23%).
About Cenovus Energy
CVE stock →Cenovus Energy Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, produces, refines, transports, and markets crude oil, natural gas, and refined petroleum products in Canada, the United States, and China. It operates through Upstream and Downstream segments.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 7,211 employees
About EQT
EQT stock →EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,523 employees
CVE vs EQT FAQ
Which is bigger, Cenovus Energy or EQT?
Cenovus Energy (CVE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $58.00B compared with $33.13B for EQT (EQT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CVE or EQT?
CVE returned +78.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.15% for EQT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CVE or EQT?
CVE has the lower trailing P/E at 12.1, versus 12.3 for EQT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cenovus Energy or EQT?
Cenovus Energy has the higher yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.23% for EQT.
Are Cenovus Energy and EQT in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.