Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs Ingersoll Rand (IR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Ingersoll Rand (IR) has outperformed Curtiss-Wright (CW) over the past year, losing 3.7% versus a loss of 8.9%. Over five years, CW leads with a +285.9% price change compared with +47.1% for IR. Ingersoll Rand is the larger company by market cap ($30.26 billion vs $18.74 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Curtiss-Wright is growing revenue faster (+12.1% vs +5.7%).
On valuation, Ingersoll Rand trades at a lower forward P/E (19.9x vs 29.6x for Curtiss-Wright). Curtiss-Wright offers the higher dividend yield (0.19% vs 0.15%). Curtiss-Wright converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.8% versus 7.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CW | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $507.29 | $78.00 |
| Market cap | $18.74B | $30.26B |
| 1-day change | -0.36% | +0.98% |
| YTD return | -7.98% | -1.54% |
| 1-year return | -8.92% | -3.69% |
| 5-year return | +285.89% | +47.10% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 34.94 | 32.10 |
| Forward P/E | 29.57 | 19.94 |
| EPS (TTM) | $14.52 | $2.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Annual dividend | $0.98 | $0.12 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.50B | $7.65B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.08% | +5.75% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $484.23M | $581.40M |
| Gross margin | 37.20% | 43.61% |
| Operating margin | 18.11% | 14.96% |
| Net margin | 13.84% | 7.60% |
| 52-week high | $808.16 | $100.96 |
| 52-week low | $501.60 | $68.07 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.23% | -22.74% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +54.99% | +21.42% |
| Average volume | 362.27K | 4.32M |
| Shares outstanding | 36.93M | 388.00M |
| Employees | 9,200 | 21,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Curtiss-Wright is more profitable, keeping 13.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 7.6 cents for Ingersoll Rand.
- Curtiss-Wright grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.08% vs +5.75%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Curtiss-Wright in Technology and Ingersoll Rand in Industrials.
About Curtiss-Wright
CW stock →Curtiss-Wright Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides engineered products, solutions, and services mainly to aerospace and defense, commercial nuclear power, process, and industrial markets worldwide. It operates through three segments: Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power.
Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 9,200 employees
About Ingersoll Rand
IR stock →Ingersoll Rand Inc. provides mission-critical air, fluid, clean energy, and medical technologies services and solutions worldwide.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 21,000 employees
CW vs IR FAQ
Which is bigger, Curtiss-Wright or Ingersoll Rand?
Ingersoll Rand (IR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $30.26B compared with $18.74B for Curtiss-Wright (CW).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CW or IR?
IR returned -3.69% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.92% for CW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CW or IR?
IR has the lower trailing P/E at 32.1, versus 34.9 for CW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Curtiss-Wright or Ingersoll Rand?
Curtiss-Wright has the higher yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.15% for Ingersoll Rand.
Are Curtiss-Wright and Ingersoll Rand in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.