MetaCap

HF Sinclair (DINO) vs Plains All American Pipeline L.P. (PAA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

HF Sinclair (DINO) has outperformed Plains All American Pipeline L.P. (PAA) over the past year, gaining 122.5% versus a gain of 44.3%. Over five years, DINO leads with a +217.3% price change compared with +116.8% for PAA. HF Sinclair is the larger company by market cap ($20.56 billion vs $17.00 billion), about 1.2 times the size.

On valuation, HF Sinclair trades at a lower forward P/E (8.8x vs 12.6x for Plains All American Pipeline L.P.). Plains All American Pipeline L.P. offers the higher dividend yield (6.78% vs 1.73%). Plains All American Pipeline L.P. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.2% versus 2.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

DINO+120.47%PAA+44.33%
+131%+56%-19%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
DINO+233.32%PAA+130.90%
+247%+107%-33%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

DINO versus PAA key metrics
MetricDINOPAA
Share price$115.63$24.09
Market cap$20.56B$17.00B
1-day change+0.90%+0.12%
YTD return+150.93%+33.96%
1-year return+122.45%+44.33%
5-year return+217.32%+116.76%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.0120.77
Forward P/E8.7812.59
EPS (TTM)$10.50$1.16
Dividend yield1.73%6.78%
Annual dividend$2.00$1.63
Revenue (latest FY)$26.87B$44.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)-5.99%-9.46%
Net income (latest FY)$579.00M$1.44B
Gross margin8.56%8.65%
Operating margin3.45%3.24%
Net margin2.15%3.24%
52-week high$118.39$26.39
52-week low$45.71$15.69
Distance from 52-week high-2.33%-8.72%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside-7.92%+8.47%
Average volume2.74M2.52M
Shares outstanding177.78M705.57M
Employees5,1653,900
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryNatural Gas DistributionNatural Gas Distribution

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • DINO has outperformed PAA by 78.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Plains All American Pipeline L.P. trades at a higher earnings multiple (20.8x vs 11.0x trailing P/E).
  • Plains All American Pipeline L.P. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.78% vs 1.73%).

About HF Sinclair

DINO stock →

HF Sinclair Corporation operates as an independent energy company in the United States. It operates through five segments: Refining, Renewables, Marketing, Lubricants & Specialties, and Midstream.

Energy · Natural Gas Distribution · 5,165 employees

About Plains All American Pipeline L.P.

PAA stock →

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., through its subsidiaries, engages in the pipeline transportation, terminalling, storage, and gathering of crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) in the United States and Canada. The company operates through two segments, Crude Oil and NGL.

Energy · Natural Gas Distribution · 3,900 employees

DINO vs PAA FAQ

Which is bigger, HF Sinclair or Plains All American Pipeline L.P.?

HF Sinclair (DINO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $20.56B compared with $17.00B for Plains All American Pipeline L.P. (PAA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, DINO or PAA?

DINO returned +122.45% over the past 12 months, compared with +44.33% for PAA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, DINO or PAA?

DINO has the lower trailing P/E at 11.0, versus 20.8 for PAA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, HF Sinclair or Plains All American Pipeline L.P.?

Plains All American Pipeline L.P. has the higher yield at 6.78%, compared with 1.73% for HF Sinclair.

Are HF Sinclair and Plains All American Pipeline L.P. in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Natural Gas Distribution industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons