BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) vs Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has outperformed BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) over the past year, losing 9.8% versus a loss of 14.9%. Over five years, ECAT leads with a -29.6% price change compared with -29.9% for RQI. Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund is the larger company by market cap ($1.50 billion vs $1.40 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.6x vs 6.8x for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund). Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund pays a dividend yielding 9.17%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ECAT | RQI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.11 | $11.12 |
| Market cap | $1.40B | $1.50B |
| 1-day change | +0.14% | +1.46% |
| YTD return | -8.39% | -2.63% |
| 1-year return | -14.92% | -9.81% |
| 5-year return | -29.59% | -29.93% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.64 | 6.82 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.50 | $1.63 |
| Dividend yield | 22.52% | 9.17% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.02 |
| 52-week high | $16.67 | $13.57 |
| 52-week low | $13.36 | $10.81 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.36% | -18.05% |
| Average volume | 538.92K | 684.98K |
| Shares outstanding | 99.47M | 134.52M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (22.52% vs 9.17%).
About Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
RQI stock →Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Cohen & Steers, Inc.
Finance · Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable
ECAT vs RQI FAQ
Which is bigger, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term or Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund?
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.50B compared with $1.40B for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECAT or RQI?
RQI returned -9.81% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.92% for ECAT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECAT or RQI?
ECAT has the lower trailing P/E at 5.6, versus 6.8 for RQI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term or Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund?
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term has the higher yield at 22.52%, compared with 9.17% for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund.
Are BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund in the same industry?
Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Finance/Investors Services for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term and Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund.