Expedia Group (EXPE) vs GXO Logistics (GXO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Expedia Group (EXPE) has outperformed GXO Logistics (GXO) over the past year, gaining 27.2% versus a loss of 13.3%. Over five years, EXPE leads with a +57.1% price change compared with -44.0% for GXO. Expedia Group is the larger company by market cap ($32.91 billion vs $5.34 billion), about 6.2 times the size, while GXO Logistics is growing revenue faster (+12.5% vs +7.6%).
On valuation, Expedia Group trades at a lower forward P/E (11.2x vs 13.2x for GXO Logistics). Expedia Group pays a dividend yielding 0.64%, while GXO Logistics does not currently pay one. Expedia Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.8% versus 0.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EXPE | GXO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $274.22 | $46.56 |
| Market cap | $32.91B | $5.34B |
| 1-day change | +1.51% | +0.43% |
| YTD return | -4.65% | -11.55% |
| 1-year return | +27.17% | -13.34% |
| 5-year return | +57.06% | -43.97% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.13 | 41.20 |
| Forward P/E | 11.17 | 13.17 |
| EPS (TTM) | $16.01 | $1.13 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.76 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $14.73B | $13.18B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.61% | +12.55% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.29B | $32.00M |
| Gross margin | 90.12% | — |
| Operating margin | 12.70% | 1.86% |
| Net margin | 8.78% | 0.24% |
| 52-week high | $342.00 | $66.85 |
| 52-week low | $185.34 | $43.61 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.82% | -30.35% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.54% | +47.32% |
| Average volume | 1.82M | 1.41M |
| Shares outstanding | 114.50M | 114.68M |
| Employees | 16,000 | 150,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Transportation Services | Transportation Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Expedia Group is about 6.2 times larger than GXO Logistics by market value ($32.91B vs $5.34B).
- EXPE has outperformed GXO by 40.5 percentage points over the past year.
- GXO Logistics trades at a higher earnings multiple (41.2x vs 17.1x trailing P/E).
- Expedia Group is more profitable, keeping 8.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.2 cents for GXO Logistics.
About Expedia Group
EXPE stock →Expedia Group, Inc. operates as an online travel company in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Transportation Services · 16,000 employees
About GXO Logistics
GXO stock →GXO Logistics, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides logistics services worldwide. It provides warehousing and distribution, order fulfilment, e-commerce, reverse logistics, and other supply chain services.
Consumer Discretionary · Transportation Services · 150,000 employees
EXPE vs GXO FAQ
Which is bigger, Expedia Group or GXO Logistics?
Expedia Group (EXPE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.91B compared with $5.34B for GXO Logistics (GXO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EXPE or GXO?
EXPE returned +27.17% over the past 12 months, compared with -13.34% for GXO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EXPE or GXO?
EXPE has the lower trailing P/E at 17.1, versus 41.2 for GXO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Expedia Group or GXO Logistics?
Expedia Group pays a dividend yielding 0.64%, while GXO Logistics does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Expedia Group and GXO Logistics in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Transportation Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.