Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Diamondback Energy (FANG) has outperformed Pembina Pipeline (PBA) over the past year, gaining 33.2% versus a gain of 19.3%. Over five years, FANG leads with a +77.4% price change compared with +37.5% for PBA. Diamondback Energy is the larger company by market cap ($53.80 billion vs $27.51 billion), about 2.0 times the size.
On valuation, Diamondback Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (10.3x vs 21.1x for Pembina Pipeline). Pembina Pipeline offers the higher dividend yield (6.10% vs 2.21%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FANG | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $192.13 | $47.31 |
| Market cap | $53.80B | $27.51B |
| 1-day change | +0.23% | +0.34% |
| YTD return | +27.81% | +24.30% |
| 1-year return | +33.23% | +19.35% |
| 5-year return | +77.44% | +37.53% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.60 | 23.08 |
| Forward P/E | 10.25 | 21.07 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.25 | $2.05 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 6.10% |
| Annual dividend | $4.25 | $2.89 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $15.03B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +35.79% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.66B | — |
| Operating margin | 8.43% | — |
| Net margin | 11.07% | — |
| 52-week high | $216.90 | $51.58 |
| 52-week low | $137.03 | $36.20 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.42% | -8.28% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.14% | -1.27% |
| Average volume | 2.35M | 996.87K |
| Shares outstanding | 280.02M | 581.55M |
| Employees | 1,762 | 2,974 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FANG has outperformed PBA by 13.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Diamondback Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.6x vs 23.1x trailing P/E).
- Pembina Pipeline offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.10% vs 2.21%).
About Diamondback Energy
FANG stock →Diamondback Energy, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas company, acquires, develops, explores, and exploits unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas, the United States. The company primarily focuses on the development of the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations of the Midland Basin; and the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations of the Delaware Basin, both of which are part of the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,762 employees
About Pembina Pipeline
PBA stock →Pembina Pipeline Corporation provides energy transportation and midstream services. It operates through three segments: Pipelines, Facilities, and Marketing & New Ventures.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 2,974 employees
FANG vs PBA FAQ
Which is bigger, Diamondback Energy or Pembina Pipeline?
Diamondback Energy (FANG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $53.80B compared with $27.51B for Pembina Pipeline (PBA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FANG or PBA?
FANG returned +33.23% over the past 12 months, compared with +19.35% for PBA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FANG or PBA?
PBA has the lower trailing P/E at 23.1, versus 36.6 for FANG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Diamondback Energy or Pembina Pipeline?
Pembina Pipeline has the higher yield at 6.10%, compared with 2.21% for Diamondback Energy.
Are Diamondback Energy and Pembina Pipeline in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.