Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) vs Fiserv (FISV)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has outperformed Fiserv (FISV) over the past year, losing 49.6% versus a loss of 63.7%. Over five years, FISV leads with a -58.7% price change compared with -72.5% for FIS. Fiserv is the larger company by market cap ($24.20 billion vs $17.63 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Fidelity National Information Services is growing revenue faster (+5.4% vs +3.6%).
On valuation, Fidelity National Information Services trades at a lower forward P/E (5.1x vs 5.7x for Fiserv). Fidelity National Information Services pays a dividend yielding 4.91%, while Fiserv does not currently pay one. Fiserv converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.4% versus 3.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIS | FISV |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $34.19 | $45.52 |
| Market cap | $17.63B | $24.20B |
| 1-day change | -0.45% | -0.93% |
| YTD return | -48.33% | -31.61% |
| 1-year return | -49.60% | -63.69% |
| 5-year return | -72.48% | -58.73% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.25 | 8.74 |
| Forward P/E | 5.11 | 5.68 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.51 | $5.21 |
| Dividend yield | 4.91% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.68 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $10.68B | $21.19B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.43% | +3.60% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $382.00M | $3.48B |
| Gross margin | 36.86% | — |
| Operating margin | 16.31% | 27.45% |
| Net margin | 3.58% | 16.42% |
| 52-week high | $69.04 | $128.78 |
| 52-week low | $32.10 | $43.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -50.49% | -64.66% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +44.57% | +30.90% |
| Average volume | 6.21M | 7.23M |
| Shares outstanding | 515.71M | 531.77M |
| Employees | 44,000 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FIS has outperformed FISV by 14.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Fiserv trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.7x vs 5.3x trailing P/E).
- Fidelity National Information Services offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.91% vs 0.00%).
- Fiserv is more profitable, keeping 16.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.6 cents for Fidelity National Information Services.
About Fidelity National Information Services
FIS stock →Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. provides solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 44,000 employees
FIS vs FISV FAQ
Which is bigger, Fidelity National Information Services or Fiserv?
Fiserv (FISV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $24.20B compared with $17.63B for Fidelity National Information Services (FIS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIS or FISV?
FIS returned -49.60% over the past 12 months, compared with -63.69% for FISV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FIS or FISV?
FIS has the lower trailing P/E at 5.3, versus 8.7 for FISV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fidelity National Information Services or Fiserv?
Fidelity National Information Services pays a dividend yielding 4.91%, while Fiserv does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fidelity National Information Services and Fiserv in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.