Fiserv (FISV) vs Global Payments (GPN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Global Payments (GPN) has outperformed Fiserv (FISV) over the past year, losing 8.0% versus a loss of 64.2%. Over five years, GPN leads with a -49.5% price change compared with -58.7% for FISV. Fiserv is the larger company by market cap ($23.91 billion vs $21.53 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Global Payments trades at a lower forward P/E (5.1x vs 5.6x for Fiserv). Global Payments pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while Fiserv does not currently pay one. Global Payments converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.2% versus 16.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FISV | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $44.96 | $81.36 |
| Market cap | $23.91B | $21.53B |
| 1-day change | -0.77% | +0.35% |
| YTD return | -32.54% | +4.75% |
| 1-year return | -64.24% | -7.97% |
| 5-year return | -58.73% | -49.51% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.63 | 38.20 |
| Forward P/E | 5.61 | 5.08 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.21 | $2.13 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $21.19B | $7.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.60% | -0.39% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.48B | $1.40B |
| Gross margin | — | 72.57% |
| Operating margin | 27.45% | 22.77% |
| Net margin | 16.42% | 18.17% |
| 52-week high | $128.78 | $95.88 |
| 52-week low | $43.87 | $61.16 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -65.09% | -15.14% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.52% | +29.06% |
| Average volume | 7.16M | 2.79M |
| Shares outstanding | 531.77M | 264.62M |
| Employees | — | 26,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GPN has outperformed FISV by 56.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Global Payments trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.2x vs 8.6x trailing P/E).
- Global Payments offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.23% vs 0.00%).
About Global Payments
GPN stock →Global Payments Inc. provides payment technology and software solutions for card, check, and digital-based payments in the Americas, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 26,000 employees
FISV vs GPN FAQ
Which is bigger, Fiserv or Global Payments?
Fiserv (FISV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $23.91B compared with $21.53B for Global Payments (GPN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FISV or GPN?
GPN returned -7.97% over the past 12 months, compared with -64.24% for FISV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FISV or GPN?
FISV has the lower trailing P/E at 8.6, versus 38.2 for GPN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fiserv or Global Payments?
Global Payments pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while Fiserv does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fiserv and Global Payments in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.