MetaCap

Fortive (FTV) vs Snap-On (SNA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Fortive (FTV) has outperformed Snap-On (SNA) over the past year, gaining 13.9% versus a gain of 6.8%. Over five years, SNA leads with a +64.2% price change compared with +3.2% for FTV. Snap-On is the larger company by market cap ($18.62 billion vs $17.07 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Fortive is growing revenue faster (+1.9% vs +0.9%).

On valuation, Snap-On trades at a lower forward P/E (16.8x vs 17.4x for Fortive). Snap-On offers the higher dividend yield (2.63% vs 0.21%). Snap-On converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.7% versus 13.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FTV+13.93%SNA+6.84%
+31%+13%-5%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
FTV+5.99%SNA+66.98%
+99%+34%-30%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FTV versus SNA key metrics
MetricFTVSNA
Share price$56.52$359.89
Market cap$17.07B$18.62B
1-day change-2.37%-2.37%
YTD return+2.37%+4.44%
1-year return+13.93%+6.84%
5-year return+3.22%+64.21%
P/E ratio (TTM)29.7518.34
Forward P/E17.3716.76
EPS (TTM)$1.90$19.62
Dividend yield0.21%2.63%
Annual dividend$0.12$9.46
Revenue (latest FY)$4.16B$5.16B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.92%+0.93%
Net income (latest FY)$579.20M$1.02B
Gross margin63.50%—
Operating margin17.32%25.75%
Net margin13.93%19.72%
52-week high$64.56$423.02
52-week low$47.71$320.80
Distance from 52-week high-12.45%-14.92%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+12.60%+15.28%
Average volume2.43M314.80K
Shares outstanding302.02M51.73M
Employees10,00013,000
SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Fortive trades at a higher earnings multiple (29.7x vs 18.3x trailing P/E).
  • Snap-On offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.63% vs 0.21%).
  • Snap-On is more profitable, keeping 19.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.9 cents for Fortive.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Fortive in Industrials and Snap-On in Consumer Discretionary.

About Fortive

FTV stock →

Fortive Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets products, software, and services in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through Intelligent Operating Solutions and Advanced Healthcare Solutions segments.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,000 employees

About Snap-On

SNA stock →

Snap-on Incorporated manufactures and markets tools, equipment, diagnostics, and repair information and systems solutions for professional users worldwide. It operates through Commercial & Industrial Group, Snap-on Tools Group, Repair Systems & Information Group, and Financial Services segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Industrial Machinery/Components · 13,000 employees

FTV vs SNA FAQ

Which is bigger, Fortive or Snap-On?

Snap-On (SNA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $18.62B compared with $17.07B for Fortive (FTV).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FTV or SNA?

FTV returned +13.93% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.84% for SNA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FTV or SNA?

SNA has the lower trailing P/E at 18.3, versus 29.7 for FTV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Fortive or Snap-On?

Snap-On has the higher yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.21% for Fortive.

Are Fortive and Snap-On in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons