Fortive (FTV) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Woodward (WWD) has outperformed Fortive (FTV) over the past year, gaining 27.4% versus a gain of 13.9%. Over five years, WWD leads with a +180.8% price change compared with +3.2% for FTV. Woodward is the larger company by market cap ($19.15 billion vs $17.07 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Fortive trades at a lower forward P/E (17.4x vs 30.2x for Woodward). Woodward offers the higher dividend yield (0.30% vs 0.21%). Fortive converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.9% versus 12.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FTV | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.52 | $324.25 |
| Market cap | $17.07B | $19.15B |
| 1-day change | -2.37% | -2.50% |
| YTD return | +2.37% | +7.25% |
| 1-year return | +13.93% | +27.41% |
| 5-year return | +3.22% | +180.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 30.39 | 36.07 |
| Forward P/E | 17.37 | 30.19 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.86 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.30% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.16B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.92% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $579.20M | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | 63.50% | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | 17.32% | — |
| Net margin | 13.93% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $64.56 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $47.71 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.45% | -28.09% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.60% | +33.77% |
| Average volume | 2.44M | 670.05K |
| Shares outstanding | 302.02M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 10,000 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Technology | Energy |
| Industry | Scientific & Technical Instruments | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WWD has outperformed FTV by 13.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Woodward grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.30% vs +1.92%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Fortive in Technology and Woodward in Energy.
About Fortive
FTV stock →Fortive Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets products, software, and services in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through Intelligent Operating Solutions and Advanced Healthcare Solutions segments.
Technology · Scientific & Technical Instruments · 10,000 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
FTV vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Fortive or Woodward?
Woodward (WWD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $19.15B compared with $17.07B for Fortive (FTV).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FTV or WWD?
WWD returned +27.41% over the past 12 months, compared with +13.93% for FTV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FTV or WWD?
FTV has the lower trailing P/E at 30.4, versus 36.1 for WWD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fortive or Woodward?
Woodward has the higher yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.21% for Fortive.
Are Fortive and Woodward in the same industry?
No. Fortive is in the Technology sector, while Woodward is in Energy.