Gold Fields (GFI) vs Newmont (NEM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Newmont (NEM) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, gaining 30.7% versus a loss of 17.4%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +282.7% price change compared with +102.6% for NEM. Newmont is the larger company by market cap ($121.75 billion vs $31.95 billion), about 3.8 times the size.
On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 11.4x for Newmont). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 0.89%). Newmont converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 31.3% versus 23.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFI | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.86 | $115.55 |
| Market cap | $31.95B | $121.75B |
| 1-day change | +2.31% | +1.77% |
| YTD return | -17.87% | +15.72% |
| 1-year return | -17.35% | +30.71% |
| 5-year return | +282.71% | +102.61% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.35 | 14.57 |
| Forward P/E | 7.12 | 11.39 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.88 | $7.93 |
| Dividend yield | 5.96% | 0.89% |
| Annual dividend | $2.14 | $1.03 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.20B | $22.67B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.57% | +21.34% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.25B | $7.08B |
| Gross margin | 45.33% | 64.33% |
| Net margin | 23.93% | 31.25% |
| 52-week high | $61.64 | $135.29 |
| 52-week low | $31.11 | $76.05 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -41.82% | -14.59% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.72% | +19.20% |
| Average volume | 3.74M | 7.25M |
| Shares outstanding | 890.90M | 1.05B |
| Employees | — | 17,500 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Newmont is about 3.8 times larger than Gold Fields by market value ($121.75B vs $31.95B).
- NEM has outperformed GFI by 48.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Newmont trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.6x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
- Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 0.89%).
- Newmont is more profitable, keeping 31.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.9 cents for Gold Fields.
- Newmont grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+21.34% vs +15.57%).
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About Newmont
NEM stock →Newmont Corporation operates as a gold producer. It also explores for copper, silver, lead, zinc, and other metals.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals · 17,500 employees
GFI vs NEM FAQ
Which is bigger, Gold Fields or Newmont?
Newmont (NEM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $121.75B compared with $31.95B for Gold Fields (GFI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFI or NEM?
NEM returned +30.71% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.35% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GFI or NEM?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 14.6 for NEM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gold Fields or Newmont?
Gold Fields has the higher yield at 5.96%, compared with 0.89% for Newmont.
Are Gold Fields and Newmont in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.