Gold Fields (GFI) vs Iamgold (IAG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Iamgold (IAG) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, gaining 38.3% versus a loss of 16.2%. Over five years, IAG leads with a +558.0% price change compared with +274.1% for GFI. Gold Fields is the larger company by market cap ($31.94 billion vs $10.45 billion), about 3.1 times the size, while Iamgold is growing revenue faster (+74.7% vs +15.6%).
On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 7.7x for Iamgold). Gold Fields pays a dividend yielding 5.96%, while Iamgold does not currently pay one. Iamgold converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 25.7% versus 23.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.85 | $18.30 |
| Market cap | $31.94B | $10.45B |
| 1-day change | +2.28% | +1.50% |
| YTD return | -19.72% | +9.34% |
| 1-year return | -16.25% | +38.27% |
| 5-year return | +274.07% | +558.03% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.35 | 9.24 |
| Forward P/E | 7.11 | 7.71 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.88 | $1.98 |
| Dividend yield | 5.96% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $2.14 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.20B | $2.85B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.57% | +74.70% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.25B | $732.30M |
| Gross margin | 45.33% | 42.28% |
| Operating margin | — | 38.33% |
| Net margin | 23.93% | 25.67% |
| 52-week high | $61.64 | $24.87 |
| 52-week low | $31.11 | $10.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -41.84% | -26.42% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.76% | +32.95% |
| Average volume | 3.74M | 5.38M |
| Shares outstanding | 890.90M | 571.00M |
| Employees | — | 3,800 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Gold Fields is about 3.1 times larger than Iamgold by market value ($31.94B vs $10.45B).
- IAG has outperformed GFI by 54.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Iamgold trades at a higher earnings multiple (9.2x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
- Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 0.00%).
- Iamgold grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+74.70% vs +15.57%).
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About Iamgold
IAG stock →IAMGOLD Corporation, through its subsidiaries, operates as a gold producer and developer in Canada and Burkina Faso. The company's flagship project includes Côté Gold that covers an area of 596 hectares located in the Chester and Yeo Townships, district of sudbury, in northeastern Ontario.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals · 3,800 employees
GFI vs IAG FAQ
Which is bigger, Gold Fields or Iamgold?
Gold Fields (GFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $31.94B compared with $10.45B for Iamgold (IAG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFI or IAG?
IAG returned +38.27% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.25% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GFI or IAG?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 9.2 for IAG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gold Fields or Iamgold?
Gold Fields pays a dividend yielding 5.96%, while Iamgold does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Gold Fields and Iamgold in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.