Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) vs Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) has outperformed Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) over the past year, gaining 55.9% versus a gain of 33.3%. Over five years, GGAL leads with a +245.0% price change compared with +30.4% for PGC. Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. is the larger company by market cap ($6.28 billion vs $773.1 million), about 8.1 times the size.
On valuation, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (5.3x vs 9.1x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial). Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays a dividend yielding 0.46%, while Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GGAL | PGC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $37.07 | $43.61 |
| Market cap | $6.28B | $773.12M |
| 1-day change | +0.05% | +0.46% |
| YTD return | -31.31% | +55.87% |
| 1-year return | +33.27% | +55.87% |
| 5-year return | +244.97% | +30.40% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 41.65 | 15.20 |
| Forward P/E | 5.35 | 9.09 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.89 | $2.87 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 0.46% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.20 |
| 52-week high | $62.52 | $49.14 |
| 52-week low | $28.91 | $24.71 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -40.71% | -11.25% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +79.58% | +28.41% |
| Average volume | 888.18K | 165.55K |
| Shares outstanding | 132.50M | 17.73M |
| Employees | 9,435 | 682 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Commercial Banks | Commercial Banks |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. is about 8.1 times larger than Peapack-Gladstone Financial by market value ($6.28B vs $773.12M).
- PGC has outperformed GGAL by 22.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. trades at a higher earnings multiple (41.7x vs 15.2x trailing P/E).
- Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.18% vs 0.46%).
About Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
GGAL stock →Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A., a financial service holding company, provides various financial products and services to individuals and companies in Argentina. The company operates through Bank, Naranja X, Insurance, and Other Businesses segments.
Finance · Commercial Banks · 9,435 employees
About Peapack-Gladstone Financial
PGC stock →Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Peapack Private Bank & Trust that provides private banking and wealth management services in the United States. The company operates in two segments, Banking and Wealth Management.
Finance · Commercial Banks · 682 employees
GGAL vs PGC FAQ
Which is bigger, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.28B compared with $773.12M for Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GGAL or PGC?
PGC returned +55.87% over the past 12 months, compared with +33.27% for GGAL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GGAL or PGC?
PGC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.2, versus 41.7 for GGAL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. has the higher yield at 4.18%, compared with 0.46% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial.
Are Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and Peapack-Gladstone Financial in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Commercial Banks industry within the Finance sector.