Dana (DAN) vs Garrett Motion (GTX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed Dana (DAN) over the past year, gaining 98.5% versus a gain of 50.4%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +261.8% price change compared with +11.7% for DAN. Garrett Motion is the larger company by market cap ($4.82 billion vs $3.01 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Dana trades at a lower forward P/E (6.7x vs 11.3x for Garrett Motion). Dana offers the higher dividend yield (1.57% vs 1.16%). Garrett Motion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 1.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DAN | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $28.02 | $25.87 |
| Market cap | $3.01B | $4.82B |
| 1-day change | -1.44% | -0.84% |
| YTD return | +17.93% | +48.42% |
| 1-year return | +50.40% | +98.54% |
| 5-year return | +11.72% | +261.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 14.21 |
| Forward P/E | 6.69 | 11.33 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.36 | $1.82 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 1.16% |
| Annual dividend | $0.44 | $0.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.50B | $3.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.03% | +3.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $85.00M | $310.00M |
| Gross margin | 8.03% | 20.40% |
| Operating margin | 1.85% | — |
| Net margin | 1.13% | 8.65% |
| 52-week high | $39.56 | $36.25 |
| 52-week low | $17.74 | $12.26 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.17% | -28.63% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +38.01% | +39.16% |
| Average volume | 1.40M | 2.47M |
| Shares outstanding | 107.58M | 186.49M |
| Employees | 27,300 | 6,300 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Auto Parts:O.E.M. |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GTX has outperformed DAN by 48.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Garrett Motion is more profitable, keeping 8.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.1 cents for Dana.
- Garrett Motion grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.14% vs -3.03%).
About Dana
DAN stock →Dana Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, provides power-conveyance and energy-management solutions for on-highway vehicles in North America, Europe, South America, and the Asia Pacific. The Light Vehicle segment provides axles, driveshafts, internal combustion engine (ICE), hybrid and electric transmissions, e-axle and e-transmission systems, inverters, electric motors, controllers, sealing and thermal products, e-sealing, e-thermal cooling systems, battery and electronics cooling, hydrogen fuel cell cooling, and new power industrial cooling.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 27,300 employees
About Garrett Motion
GTX stock →Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees
DAN vs GTX FAQ
Which is bigger, Dana or Garrett Motion?
Garrett Motion (GTX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.82B compared with $3.01B for Dana (DAN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DAN or GTX?
GTX returned +98.54% over the past 12 months, compared with +50.40% for DAN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Dana or Garrett Motion?
Dana has the higher yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.16% for Garrett Motion.
Are Dana and Garrett Motion in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.