Helen of Troy (HELE) vs Hooker Furnishings (HOFT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Hooker Furnishings (HOFT) has outperformed Helen of Troy (HELE) over the past year, gaining 40.5% versus a loss of 5.4%. Over five years, HOFT leads with a -50.6% price change compared with -88.7% for HELE. Helen of Troy is the larger company by market cap ($595.1 million vs $137.9 million), about 4.3 times the size.
On valuation, Helen of Troy trades at a lower forward P/E (6.6x vs 10.7x for Hooker Furnishings). Hooker Furnishings pays a dividend yielding 4.46%, while Helen of Troy does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | HELE | HOFT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $25.55 | $12.90 |
| Market cap | $595.11M | $137.93M |
| 1-day change | +0.91% | -0.08% |
| YTD return | +20.24% | +14.26% |
| 1-year return | -5.41% | +40.52% |
| 5-year return | -88.68% | -50.56% |
| Forward P/E | 6.59 | 10.66 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-17.96 | $-0.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.46% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.575 |
| 52-week high | $30.68 | $18.09 |
| 52-week low | $13.85 | $8.62 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.72% | -28.69% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.62% | +27.91% |
| Average volume | 419.66K | 49.22K |
| Shares outstanding | 23.29M | 10.69M |
| Employees | 1,854 | 840 |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Helen of Troy is about 4.3 times larger than Hooker Furnishings by market value ($595.11M vs $137.93M).
- HOFT has outperformed HELE by 45.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Hooker Furnishings offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.46% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Helen of Troy in Consumer Defensive and Hooker Furnishings in Consumer Cyclical.
About Helen of Troy
HELE stock →Helen of Troy Limited operates as a consumer products company in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and Latin America. The Home & Outdoor segment offers food storage containers, kitchen utensils for cooking and preparing salads, fruits, vegetables and meats, graters, slicers and choppers, baking essentials, kitchen organization, bath, cleaning, infant and toddler products, and coffee preparation tools and electronics.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 1,854 employees
About Hooker Furnishings
HOFT stock →Hooker Furnishings Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, imports, and markets residential household, hospitality and contract furniture, lighting, accessories, and home décor products in North America. It operates through Hooker Branded, Domestic Upholstery, and All Other segments.
Consumer Cyclical · Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · 840 employees
HELE vs HOFT FAQ
Which is bigger, Helen of Troy or Hooker Furnishings?
Helen of Troy (HELE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $595.11M compared with $137.93M for Hooker Furnishings (HOFT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, HELE or HOFT?
HOFT returned +40.52% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.41% for HELE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Helen of Troy or Hooker Furnishings?
Hooker Furnishings pays a dividend yielding 4.46%, while Helen of Troy does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Helen of Troy and Hooker Furnishings in the same industry?
No. Helen of Troy is in the Consumer Defensive sector, while Hooker Furnishings is in Consumer Cyclical.