Hamilton Insurance Group (HG) vs White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Hamilton Insurance Group (HG) has outperformed White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) over the past year, gaining 42.5% versus a gain of 8.6%. White Mountains Insurance Group is the larger company by market cap ($4.92 billion vs $3.46 billion), about 1.4 times the size. On valuation, Hamilton Insurance Group trades at a lower forward P/E (7.4x vs 22.9x for White Mountains Insurance Group).
White Mountains Insurance Group pays a dividend yielding 0.05%, while Hamilton Insurance Group does not currently pay one. White Mountains Insurance Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.6% versus 28.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | HG | WTM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.10 | $2,059.77 |
| Market cap | $3.46B | $4.92B |
| 1-day change | +2.27% | +1.39% |
| YTD return | +25.81% | -0.88% |
| 1-year return | +42.45% | +8.63% |
| 5-year return | — | +87.00% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | 4.72 |
| Forward P/E | 7.37 | 22.89 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.72 | $436.50 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.91B | $3.73B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +24.70% | +66.76% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $840.03M | $1.11B |
| Gross margin | — | 95.94% |
| Net margin | 28.91% | 29.62% |
| 52-week high | $37.31 | $2,333.00 |
| 52-week low | $22.66 | $1,830.13 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.92% | -11.71% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +9.09% | — |
| Average volume | 393.49K | 19.73K |
| Shares outstanding | 65.89M | 2.39M |
| Employees | 600 | 1,648 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- HG has outperformed WTM by 33.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Hamilton Insurance Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (6.1x vs 4.7x trailing P/E).
- White Mountains Insurance Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+66.76% vs +24.70%).
About Hamilton Insurance Group
HG stock →Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd., through its subsidiaries, operates as specialty insurance and reinsurance company in Bermuda and internationally. It operates Hamilton Global Specialty, Hamilton Select, and Hamilton Re underwriting platforms.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 600 employees
About White Mountains Insurance Group
WTM stock →White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. provides insurance services in the United States, the United Kingdom, Bermuda, and internationally.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 1,648 employees
HG vs WTM FAQ
Which is bigger, Hamilton Insurance Group or White Mountains Insurance Group?
White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.92B compared with $3.46B for Hamilton Insurance Group (HG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, HG or WTM?
HG returned +42.45% over the past 12 months, compared with +8.63% for WTM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, HG or WTM?
WTM has the lower trailing P/E at 4.7, versus 6.1 for HG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Hamilton Insurance Group or White Mountains Insurance Group?
White Mountains Insurance Group pays a dividend yielding 0.05%, while Hamilton Insurance Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Hamilton Insurance Group and White Mountains Insurance Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.