MetaCap

Radian Group (RDN) vs White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) has outperformed Radian Group (RDN) over the past year, gaining 6.6% versus a loss of 2.8%. Over five years, WTM leads with a +84.4% price change compared with +38.9% for RDN. White Mountains Insurance Group is the larger company by market cap ($4.85 billion vs $4.46 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, Radian Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.5x vs 22.6x for White Mountains Insurance Group). Radian Group offers the higher dividend yield (3.03% vs 0.05%). Radian Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 48.7% versus 29.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

RDN-2.77%WTM+6.63%
+23%+5%-13%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
RDN+44.51%WTM+84.68%
+117%+45%-28%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

RDN versus WTM key metrics
MetricRDNWTM
Share price$33.70$2,031.50
Market cap$4.46B$4.85B
1-day change-1.20%-0.28%
YTD return-6.36%-2.24%
1-year return-2.77%+6.63%
5-year return+38.85%+84.44%
P/E ratio (TTM)8.324.65
Forward P/E6.4522.57
EPS (TTM)$4.05$436.50
Dividend yield3.03%0.05%
Annual dividend$1.02$1.00
Revenue (latest FY)$1.20B$3.73B
Revenue growth (YoY)-0.76%+66.76%
Net income (latest FY)$582.64M$1.11B
Gross margin—95.94%
Net margin48.67%29.62%
52-week high$41.05$2,333.00
52-week low$30.53$1,830.13
Distance from 52-week high-17.90%-12.92%
Analyst consensusbuy—
Avg. price target upside+32.55%—
Average volume1.35M19.81K
Shares outstanding132.30M2.39M
Employees9001,648
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryProperty-Casualty InsurersProperty-Casualty Insurers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Radian Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.3x vs 4.7x trailing P/E).
  • Radian Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.03% vs 0.05%).
  • Radian Group is more profitable, keeping 48.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 29.6 cents for White Mountains Insurance Group.
  • White Mountains Insurance Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+66.76% vs -0.76%).

About Radian Group

RDN stock →

Radian Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides mortgage insurance in the United States. It aggregates, manages, and distributes mortgage credit risk for the benefit of mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors through private mortgage insurance on residential first-lien mortgage loans.

Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 900 employees

About White Mountains Insurance Group

WTM stock →

White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. provides insurance services in the United States, the United Kingdom, Bermuda, and internationally.

Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 1,648 employees

RDN vs WTM FAQ

Which is bigger, Radian Group or White Mountains Insurance Group?

White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.85B compared with $4.46B for Radian Group (RDN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, RDN or WTM?

WTM returned +6.63% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.77% for RDN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, RDN or WTM?

WTM has the lower trailing P/E at 4.7, versus 8.3 for RDN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Radian Group or White Mountains Insurance Group?

Radian Group has the higher yield at 3.03%, compared with 0.05% for White Mountains Insurance Group.

Are Radian Group and White Mountains Insurance Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons