Howmet Aerospace (HWM) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Woodward (WWD) has outperformed Howmet Aerospace (HWM) over the past year, gaining 28.5% versus a gain of 16.1%. Over five years, HWM leads with a +610.4% price change compared with +180.1% for WWD. Howmet Aerospace is the larger company by market cap ($89.99 billion vs $19.62 billion), about 4.6 times the size.
On valuation, Woodward trades at a lower forward P/E (30.9x vs 34.9x for Howmet Aerospace). Woodward offers the higher dividend yield (0.29% vs 0.21%). Howmet Aerospace converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.3% versus 12.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | HWM | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $225.66 | $332.33 |
| Market cap | $89.99B | $19.62B |
| 1-day change | +1.39% | +2.74% |
| YTD return | +8.56% | +6.99% |
| 1-year return | +16.13% | +28.51% |
| 5-year return | +610.37% | +180.14% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 48.63 | 36.97 |
| Forward P/E | 34.94 | 30.89 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.64 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.29% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.25B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.06% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.51B | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | 34.17% | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | 24.79% | — |
| Net margin | 18.27% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $310.00 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $183.83 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -27.21% | -26.30% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +46.90% | +30.14% |
| Average volume | 2.74M | 665.22K |
| Shares outstanding | 398.80M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 25,430 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Industrials | Energy |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Howmet Aerospace is about 4.6 times larger than Woodward by market value ($89.99B vs $19.62B).
- WWD has outperformed HWM by 12.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Howmet Aerospace trades at a higher earnings multiple (48.6x vs 37.0x trailing P/E).
- Howmet Aerospace is more profitable, keeping 18.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.4 cents for Woodward.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Howmet Aerospace in Industrials and Woodward in Energy.
About Howmet Aerospace
HWM stock →Howmet Aerospace Inc. provides advanced engineered solutions for the aerospace and transportation industries in the United States, Japan, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Italy, Canada, Poland, China, and internationally.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 25,430 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
HWM vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Howmet Aerospace or Woodward?
Howmet Aerospace (HWM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $89.99B compared with $19.62B for Woodward (WWD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, HWM or WWD?
WWD returned +28.51% over the past 12 months, compared with +16.13% for HWM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, HWM or WWD?
WWD has the lower trailing P/E at 37.0, versus 48.6 for HWM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Howmet Aerospace or Woodward?
Woodward has the higher yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.21% for Howmet Aerospace.
Are Howmet Aerospace and Woodward in the same industry?
No. Howmet Aerospace is in the Industrials sector, while Woodward is in Energy.