Symbotic (SYM) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Woodward (WWD) has outperformed Symbotic (SYM) over the past year, gaining 27.4% versus a loss of 36.7%. Over five years, SYM leads with a +339.2% price change compared with +180.8% for WWD. Symbotic is the larger company by market cap ($26.22 billion vs $19.15 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Woodward trades at a lower forward P/E (30.2x vs 56.1x for Symbotic). Woodward pays a dividend yielding 0.30%, while Symbotic does not currently pay one. Woodward converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.4% versus -0.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | SYM | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $43.31 | $324.25 |
| Market cap | $26.22B | $19.15B |
| 1-day change | -1.90% | -2.50% |
| YTD return | -27.21% | +7.25% |
| 1-year return | -36.70% | +27.41% |
| 5-year return | +339.25% | +180.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 541.38 | 36.07 |
| Forward P/E | 56.13 | 30.19 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.08 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.25B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +25.65% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-16.94M | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | 18.81% | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | -5.12% | — |
| Net margin | -0.75% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $87.88 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $37.68 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -50.72% | -28.09% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +45.14% | +33.77% |
| Average volume | 1.62M | 670.05K |
| Shares outstanding | 129.87M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 2,000 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Industrials | Energy |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WWD has outperformed SYM by 64.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Symbotic trades at a higher earnings multiple (541.4x vs 36.1x trailing P/E).
- Woodward is more profitable, keeping 12.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.8 cents for Symbotic.
- Symbotic grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+25.65% vs +7.30%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Symbotic in Industrials and Woodward in Energy.
About Symbotic
SYM stock →Symbotic Inc., an automation technology company, develops technologies to enhance operating efficiencies in modern warehouses. The company automates the processing of pallets, cases, and individual items in warehouses.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,000 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
SYM vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Symbotic or Woodward?
Symbotic (SYM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.22B compared with $19.15B for Woodward (WWD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, SYM or WWD?
WWD returned +27.41% over the past 12 months, compared with -36.70% for SYM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, SYM or WWD?
WWD has the lower trailing P/E at 36.1, versus 541.4 for SYM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Symbotic or Woodward?
Woodward pays a dividend yielding 0.30%, while Symbotic does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Symbotic and Woodward in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.