Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Woodward (WWD) has outperformed Ingersoll Rand (IR) over the past year, gaining 27.4% versus a loss of 5.1%. Over five years, WWD leads with a +180.8% price change compared with +47.1% for IR. Ingersoll Rand is the larger company by market cap ($29.97 billion vs $19.15 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Woodward is growing revenue faster (+7.3% vs +5.7%).
On valuation, Ingersoll Rand trades at a lower forward P/E (19.7x vs 30.2x for Woodward). Woodward offers the higher dividend yield (0.30% vs 0.16%). Woodward converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.4% versus 7.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IR | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $77.24 | $324.25 |
| Market cap | $29.97B | $19.15B |
| 1-day change | -2.49% | -2.50% |
| YTD return | -2.50% | +7.25% |
| 1-year return | -5.05% | +27.41% |
| 5-year return | +47.10% | +180.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 31.79 | 36.07 |
| Forward P/E | 19.75 | 30.19 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.43 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.30% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.65B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.75% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $581.40M | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | 43.61% | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | 14.96% | — |
| Net margin | 7.60% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $100.96 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $68.07 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.49% | -28.09% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.62% | +33.77% |
| Average volume | 4.29M | 670.05K |
| Shares outstanding | 388.00M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 21,000 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Industrials | Energy |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WWD has outperformed IR by 32.5 percentage points over the past year.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Ingersoll Rand in Industrials and Woodward in Energy.
About Ingersoll Rand
IR stock →Ingersoll Rand Inc. provides mission-critical air, fluid, clean energy, and medical technologies services and solutions worldwide.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 21,000 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
IR vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Ingersoll Rand or Woodward?
Ingersoll Rand (IR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $29.97B compared with $19.15B for Woodward (WWD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IR or WWD?
WWD returned +27.41% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.05% for IR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IR or WWD?
IR has the lower trailing P/E at 31.8, versus 36.1 for WWD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Ingersoll Rand or Woodward?
Woodward has the higher yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.16% for Ingersoll Rand.
Are Ingersoll Rand and Woodward in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.