Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) vs Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has outperformed Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN) over the past year, losing 6.0% versus a loss of 24.7%. Over five years, ISRG leads with a +25.0% price change compared with -24.0% for SNN. Intuitive Surgical is the larger company by market cap ($146.76 billion vs $11.28 billion), about 13.0 times the size.
On valuation, Smith & Nephew SNATS trades at a lower forward P/E (11.2x vs 34.3x for Intuitive Surgical). Smith & Nephew SNATS pays a dividend yielding 1.47%, while Intuitive Surgical does not currently pay one. Intuitive Surgical converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.4% versus 10.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ISRG | SNN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $415.41 | $26.96 |
| Market cap | $146.76B | $11.28B |
| 1-day change | +0.21% | +0.26% |
| YTD return | -26.81% | -18.04% |
| 1-year return | -5.99% | -24.74% |
| 5-year return | +25.04% | -24.02% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 47.64 | 18.34 |
| Forward P/E | 34.30 | 11.18 |
| EPS (TTM) | $8.72 | $1.47 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.47% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.397 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $10.06B | $6.16B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +20.51% | +6.09% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.86B | $625.00M |
| Gross margin | 66.00% | 68.01% |
| Operating margin | 29.27% | 12.88% |
| Net margin | 28.38% | 10.14% |
| 52-week high | $603.88 | $37.51 |
| 52-week low | $328.57 | $26.12 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.21% | -28.13% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +14.94% | +19.88% |
| Average volume | 2.92M | 1.66M |
| Shares outstanding | 353.28M | 418.52M |
| Employees | 17,021 | 17,000 |
| Sector | Health Care | Healthcare |
| Industry | Industrial Specialties | Medical Devices |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Intuitive Surgical is about 13.0 times larger than Smith & Nephew SNATS by market value ($146.76B vs $11.28B).
- ISRG has outperformed SNN by 18.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Intuitive Surgical trades at a higher earnings multiple (47.6x vs 18.3x trailing P/E).
- Smith & Nephew SNATS offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.47% vs 0.00%).
- Intuitive Surgical is more profitable, keeping 28.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.1 cents for Smith & Nephew SNATS.
- Intuitive Surgical grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+20.51% vs +6.09%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Intuitive Surgical in Health Care and Smith & Nephew SNATS in Healthcare.
About Intuitive Surgical
ISRG stock →Intuitive Surgical, Inc. develops, manufactures, and markets products that enable physicians and healthcare providers to enhance the quality of and access to minimally invasive care in the United States and internationally.
Health Care · Industrial Specialties · 17,021 employees
About Smith & Nephew SNATS
SNN stock →Smith & Nephew plc, together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, markets, and sells medical devices and services in the United Kingdom, the United States, and internationally. The company operates in three segments: Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine & ENT, and Advanced Wound Management.
Healthcare · Medical Devices · 17,000 employees
ISRG vs SNN FAQ
Which is bigger, Intuitive Surgical or Smith & Nephew SNATS?
Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $146.76B compared with $11.28B for Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ISRG or SNN?
ISRG returned -5.99% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.74% for SNN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ISRG or SNN?
SNN has the lower trailing P/E at 18.3, versus 47.6 for ISRG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Intuitive Surgical or Smith & Nephew SNATS?
Smith & Nephew SNATS pays a dividend yielding 1.47%, while Intuitive Surgical does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Intuitive Surgical and Smith & Nephew SNATS in the same industry?
No. Intuitive Surgical is in the Health Care sector, while Smith & Nephew SNATS is in Healthcare.