Monster Beverage (MNST) vs Constellation Brands (STZ)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Monster Beverage (MNST) has outperformed Constellation Brands (STZ) over the past year, gaining 27.0% versus a loss of 13.4%. Over five years, MNST leads with a +104.0% price change compared with -43.5% for STZ. Monster Beverage is the larger company by market cap ($85.63 billion vs $20.77 billion), about 4.1 times the size.
On valuation, Constellation Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (10.0x vs 33.4x for Monster Beverage). Constellation Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.34%, while Monster Beverage does not currently pay one. Monster Beverage converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.0% versus 18.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MNST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $43.71 | $122.76 |
| Market cap | $85.63B | $20.77B |
| 1-day change | +0.14% | -0.71% |
| YTD return | +13.86% | -10.39% |
| 1-year return | +27.02% | -13.40% |
| 5-year return | +104.02% | -43.54% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 40.47 | 10.99 |
| Forward P/E | 33.41 | 10.01 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.08 | $11.17 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.34% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $4.10 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.29B | $9.14B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.70% | -10.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.91B | $1.69B |
| Gross margin | 55.85% | 51.55% |
| Operating margin | 29.17% | 29.78% |
| Net margin | 22.97% | 18.46% |
| 52-week high | $50.17 | $168.60 |
| 52-week low | $32.94 | $110.60 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.88% | -27.19% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +14.44% | +31.12% |
| Average volume | 10.41M | 2.19M |
| Shares outstanding | 1.96B | 169.20M |
| Employees | 5,773 | 9,400 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Beverages (Production/Distribution) | Beverages (Production/Distribution) |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Monster Beverage is about 4.1 times larger than Constellation Brands by market value ($85.63B vs $20.77B).
- MNST has outperformed STZ by 40.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Monster Beverage trades at a higher earnings multiple (40.5x vs 11.0x trailing P/E).
- Constellation Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.34% vs 0.00%).
- Monster Beverage grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+10.70% vs -10.48%).
About Monster Beverage
MNST stock →Monster Beverage Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in development, marketing, sale, and distribution of energy drink beverages and concentrates in the United States and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Monster Energy Drinks, Strategic Brands, Alcohol Brands, and Other.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 5,773 employees
About Constellation Brands
STZ stock →Constellation Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces, imports, markets, and sells beer, wine, and spirits in the United States, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, and Italy. It offers beer under the Corona Extra, Corona Familiar, Corona Sunbrew, Corona Light, Corona Non-Alcoholic, Corona Premier, Modelo Especial, Modelo Chelada, Modelo Negra, Modelo Spiked Aguas Frescas, Modelo Oro, Modelo Noche Especial, Victoria, Vicky Chamoy, and Pacifico brand names.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 9,400 employees
MNST vs STZ FAQ
Which is bigger, Monster Beverage or Constellation Brands?
Monster Beverage (MNST) is larger, with a market capitalization of $85.63B compared with $20.77B for Constellation Brands (STZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MNST or STZ?
MNST returned +27.02% over the past 12 months, compared with -13.40% for STZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MNST or STZ?
STZ has the lower trailing P/E at 11.0, versus 40.5 for MNST. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Monster Beverage or Constellation Brands?
Constellation Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.34%, while Monster Beverage does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Monster Beverage and Constellation Brands in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Beverages (Production/Distribution) industry within the Consumer Staples sector.