Moog (MOG.A) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Moog (MOG.A) has outperformed Woodward (WWD) over the past year, gaining 70.1% versus a gain of 28.5%. Over five years, MOG.A leads with a +354.2% price change compared with +180.1% for WWD. Woodward is the larger company by market cap ($19.57 billion vs $11.59 billion), about 1.7 times the size.
On valuation, Moog trades at a lower forward P/E (30.5x vs 30.8x for Woodward). Moog offers the higher dividend yield (0.32% vs 0.30%). Woodward converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.4% versus 6.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MOG.A | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $365.96 | $331.48 |
| Market cap | $11.59B | $19.57B |
| 1-day change | +0.84% | +2.48% |
| YTD return | +49.01% | +6.99% |
| 1-year return | +70.15% | +28.51% |
| 5-year return | +354.22% | +180.14% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 30.91 | 36.87 |
| Forward P/E | 30.47 | 30.81 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.84 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.30% |
| Annual dividend | $1.18 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.86B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.97% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $235.03M | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | 27.39% | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | 11.65% | — |
| Net margin | 6.09% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $448.85 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $192.33 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.47% | -26.49% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +21.98% | +30.48% |
| Average volume | 276.39K | 665.22K |
| Shares outstanding | 28.44M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 13,500 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Industrials | Energy |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MOG.A has outperformed WWD by 41.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Woodward is more profitable, keeping 12.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.1 cents for Moog.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Moog in Industrials and Woodward in Energy.
About Moog
MOG.A stock →Moog Inc. designs, manufactures, and integrates precision motion and fluid controls and controls systems for original equipment manufacturers and end users in the aerospace, defense, and industrial markets in the United States, Germany, and internationally.
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · 13,500 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
MOG.A vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Moog or Woodward?
Woodward (WWD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $19.57B compared with $11.59B for Moog (MOG.A).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MOG.A or WWD?
MOG.A returned +70.15% over the past 12 months, compared with +28.51% for WWD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MOG.A or WWD?
MOG.A has the lower trailing P/E at 30.9, versus 36.9 for WWD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Moog or Woodward?
Moog has the higher yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.30% for Woodward.
Are Moog and Woodward in the same industry?
No. Moog is in the Industrials sector, while Woodward is in Energy.