MetaCap

Match Group (MTCH) vs Zoom Communications (ZM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Match Group (MTCH) has outperformed Zoom Communications (ZM) over the past year, gaining 25.0% versus a gain of 18.6%. Over five years, ZM leads with a -64.5% price change compared with -74.5% for MTCH. Zoom Communications is the larger company by market cap ($27.62 billion vs $9.68 billion), about 2.9 times the size.

On valuation, Match Group trades at a lower forward P/E (9.1x vs 14.9x for Zoom Communications). Match Group pays a dividend yielding 1.88%, while Zoom Communications does not currently pay one. Zoom Communications converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 39.0% versus 17.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MTCH+24.96%ZM+18.56%
+43%+14%-16%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
MTCH-74.06%ZM-62.88%
+13%-37%-87%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MTCH versus ZM key metrics
MetricMTCHZM
Share price$41.50$94.67
Market cap$9.68B$27.62B
1-day change+1.57%-0.11%
YTD return+28.52%+9.71%
1-year return+24.96%+18.56%
5-year return-74.47%-64.45%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.728.78
Forward P/E9.0714.93
EPS (TTM)$2.82$10.78
Dividend yield1.88%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.78$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$3.49B$4.87B
Revenue growth (YoY)+0.22%+4.36%
Net income (latest FY)$613.46M$1.90B
Gross margin72.80%77.02%
Operating margin25.02%23.08%
Net margin17.59%39.03%
52-week high$44.94$114.74
52-week low$28.81$70.70
Distance from 52-week high-7.64%-17.49%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+0.92%+24.90%
Average volume3.19M3.09M
Shares outstanding233.27M263.23M
Employees2,2007,438
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer Software: Programming Data ProcessingComputer Software: Programming Data Processing

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Zoom Communications is about 2.9 times larger than Match Group by market value ($27.62B vs $9.68B).
  • Match Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.7x vs 8.8x trailing P/E).
  • Match Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.88% vs 0.00%).
  • Zoom Communications is more profitable, keeping 39.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 17.6 cents for Match Group.

About Match Group

MTCH stock →

Match Group, Inc. provides digital technologies in the United States and internationally.

Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 2,200 employees

About Zoom Communications

ZM stock →

Zoom Communications, Inc. provides an Artificial Intelligence-first open work platform for human connection in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 7,438 employees

MTCH vs ZM FAQ

Which is bigger, Match Group or Zoom Communications?

Zoom Communications (ZM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $27.62B compared with $9.68B for Match Group (MTCH).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MTCH or ZM?

MTCH returned +24.96% over the past 12 months, compared with +18.56% for ZM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, MTCH or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E at 8.8, versus 14.7 for MTCH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Match Group or Zoom Communications?

Match Group pays a dividend yielding 1.88%, while Zoom Communications does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Match Group and Zoom Communications in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Programming Data Processing industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons