Murphy USA (MUSA) vs Rush Enterprises (RUSHA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Rush Enterprises (RUSHA) has outperformed Murphy USA (MUSA) over the past year, gaining 36.3% versus a gain of 33.9%. Over five years, MUSA leads with a +208.3% price change compared with +112.6% for RUSHA. Murphy USA is the larger company by market cap ($9.53 billion vs $5.27 billion), about 1.8 times the size.
On valuation, Rush Enterprises trades at a lower forward P/E (14.8x vs 16.9x for Murphy USA). Rush Enterprises offers the higher dividend yield (1.12% vs 0.47%). Rush Enterprises converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.5% versus 2.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MUSA | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $518.22 | $45.16 |
| Market cap | $9.53B | $5.27B |
| 1-day change | +1.31% | +0.07% |
| YTD return | +26.76% | +25.50% |
| 1-year return | +33.85% | +36.26% |
| 5-year return | +208.35% | +112.57% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.82 | 20.43 |
| Forward P/E | 16.89 | 14.79 |
| EPS (TTM) | $32.76 | $2.21 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 1.12% |
| Annual dividend | $2.43 | $0.507 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $19.38B | $7.43B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -4.25% | -4.75% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $470.60M | $263.78M |
| Gross margin | — | 19.65% |
| Operating margin | 3.71% | 5.30% |
| Net margin | 2.43% | 3.55% |
| 52-week high | $636.05 | $55.74 |
| 52-week low | $349.83 | $30.45 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.53% | -18.98% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +19.22% | +30.27% |
| Average volume | 265.89K | 673.02K |
| Shares outstanding | 18.38M | 91.71M |
| Employees | 5,900 | 7,858 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations | Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Rush Enterprises trades at a higher earnings multiple (20.4x vs 15.8x trailing P/E).
About Murphy USA
MUSA stock →Murphy USA Inc., together with subsidiaries, engages in marketing of retail motor fuel products and convenience merchandise. The company operates retail stores under the Murphy USA, Murphy Express, and QuickChek brands, as well as operates non-fuel convenience stores.
Consumer Discretionary · Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations · 5,900 employees
About Rush Enterprises
RUSHA stock →Rush Enterprises, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States and Canada. The company operates a network of commercial vehicle dealerships under the Rush Truck Centers name.
Consumer Discretionary · Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations · 7,858 employees
MUSA vs RUSHA FAQ
Which is bigger, Murphy USA or Rush Enterprises?
Murphy USA (MUSA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.53B compared with $5.27B for Rush Enterprises (RUSHA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MUSA or RUSHA?
RUSHA returned +36.26% over the past 12 months, compared with +33.85% for MUSA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MUSA or RUSHA?
MUSA has the lower trailing P/E at 15.8, versus 20.4 for RUSHA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Murphy USA or Rush Enterprises?
Rush Enterprises has the higher yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.47% for Murphy USA.
Are Murphy USA and Rush Enterprises in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.