OneMain (OMF) vs TeraWulf (WULF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
TeraWulf (WULF) has outperformed OneMain (OMF) over the past year, gaining 19.0% versus a gain of 2.1%. Over five years, OMF leads with a -5.1% price change compared with -52.1% for WULF. TeraWulf is the larger company by market cap ($7.19 billion vs $6.45 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
OneMain pays a dividend yielding 7.47%, while TeraWulf does not currently pay one. OneMain converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.0% versus -392.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | OMF | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.07 | $14.40 |
| Market cap | $6.45B | $7.19B |
| 1-day change | -0.20% | -3.81% |
| YTD return | -16.99% | +25.33% |
| 1-year return | +2.15% | +19.01% |
| 5-year return | -5.08% | -52.08% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.44 | — |
| Forward P/E | 6.57 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.64 | $-4.43 |
| Dividend yield | 7.47% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $4.19 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.90B | $168.46M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.88% | +20.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $783.00M | $-661.42M |
| Gross margin | — | 39.21% |
| Operating margin | — | -110.54% |
| Net margin | 15.97% | -392.64% |
| 52-week high | $71.93 | $29.84 |
| 52-week low | $45.78 | $10.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.05% | -51.74% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.17% | +132.50% |
| Average volume | 959.23K | 31.15M |
| Shares outstanding | 115.04M | 498.97M |
| Employees | 9,300 | 141 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WULF has outperformed OMF by 16.9 percentage points over the past year.
- OneMain offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.47% vs 0.00%).
- OneMain is more profitable, keeping 16.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -392.6 cents for TeraWulf.
- TeraWulf grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+20.28% vs +8.88%).
About OneMain
OMF stock →OneMain Holdings, Inc., a financial service holding company, engages in the consumer finance and insurance businesses in the United States. The company provides origination, underwriting, and servicing of consumer loans, consisting of personal loans and auto finance.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 9,300 employees
About TeraWulf
WULF stock →TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 141 employees
OMF vs WULF FAQ
Which is bigger, OneMain or TeraWulf?
TeraWulf (WULF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.19B compared with $6.45B for OneMain (OMF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, OMF or WULF?
WULF returned +19.01% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.15% for OMF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, OneMain or TeraWulf?
OneMain pays a dividend yielding 7.47%, while TeraWulf does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are OneMain and TeraWulf in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.